Research Best Hosting WordPress Hosting VPS Hosting Reviews Guides Methodology About See #1 Pick →
Independent Testing

Hosting Reviews Where Every Number Traces to a Test

No vendor-provided accounts. No sponsored placements. I buy every hosting plan with my own money, run load tests, measure TTFB, check CPU PassMark scores, and read the Terms of Service fine print so you don't have to. The table below is every host I hold a record for, on the plan I measured, with the plan named beside the figure.

28 Reviews Measured, Not Quoted No Sponsored Reviews
Mangesh Supe
Mangesh Supe
Hosting Expert & Benchmarker

10+ years testing hosting. I buy every plan with my own money, no vendor-provided accounts. My reviews show what you'll actually experience as a paying customer.

28
Reviews Published
26
Still Sold Today
$0
Vendor Sponsorships
10yr
Testing Experience

Every Host Compared on One Screen

One row per review, on the plan that host was measured on. Every figure here is read from the same record the review page reads, so the table and the review cannot drift apart. Where a figure does not exist, the cell says so instead of borrowing one.

Every host reviewed, on the plan it was measured on. Response time and load figures from the benchmark canon, prices from the pricing canon, both read at build time.
HostPlan measuredTTFBUnder full load rampFailed requestsUptimeIntro → renewal
KinstaSingle 20GB64ms origin44ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.99% over 54 days$29.17/mo → $29.17/mo +0%
WP EngineStartup242ms origin231ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.97% over 54 days$25.00/mo → $25.00/mo +0%
Rocket.netStarter32ms CDN edge66ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.979% over 54 days$25.00/mo → $25.00/mo +0%
WPX HostingBusiness32ms CDN edge162ms 0-250 ramp16 of 8,25099.96% over 54 days$29.99/mo → $29.99/mo +0%
LevamoStarter127ms origin159ms 0-250 ramp8 of 8,25099.97% over 54 days$29.00/mo → $29.00/mo +0%
Namecheap EasyWPStarter344ms origin1852ms 0-250 ramp211 of 8,25099.92% over 54 days$2.49/mo → $5.49/mo +120%
Liquid WebVPS 4GB74ms origin91ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.999% over 54 days$8.50/mo → $17.00/mo +100%
ScalaHostingStart23ms origin11ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.997% over 54 days$5.95/mo → $14.95/mo +151%
CloudwaysVultr HF48ms origin32ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.99% over 54 daysNo canon join
SiteGround CloudStartup312ms origin319ms 0-100 ramp165 of 3,30099.97% over 54 days$3.99/mo → $17.99/mo +351%
ContaboCloud VPS S224ms origin190ms 0-250 ramp50 of 8,25099.91% over 54 days€5.50/mo → €5.50/mo +0%
KamateraCloud Server 4GB52ms origin89ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.94% over 54 daysNo canon join
HetznerCPX11118ms origin114ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.95% over 54 daysNo canon join
VultrHF 1GB53ms origin59ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.97% over 54 daysNo canon join
OVHcloudValue186ms origin126ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.95% over 54 daysNo canon join
ChemiCloudStarter84ms origin55ms 0-250 ramp0 of 8,25099.97% over 54 days$3.49/mo → $11.95/mo +242%
HostingerPremium276ms origin145ms 0-250 ramp66 of 8,25099.95% over 54 days$2.99/mo → $10.99/mo +268%
Hostinger IndiaNot in the benchmark canonNo canon join
FastCometPlus172ms origin277ms 0-250 ramp16 of 8,25099.96% over 54 days$3.99/mo → $17.95/mo +350%
VerpexBronze233ms origin351ms 0-250 ramp31 of 8,25099.92% over 54 days$1.80/mo → $6.00/mo +233%
Hosting.comStartup172ms origin109ms 0-250 ramp31 of 8,25099.91% over 54 daysNo canon join
InMotion HostingLaunch210ms origin351ms 0-250 ramp31 of 8,25099.931% over 54 days$4.79/mo → $14.99/mo +213%
DreamHostStarter230ms origin404ms 0-250 ramp41 of 8,25099.94% over 54 daysNo canon join
BluehostBasic287ms origin3125ms 0-250 ramp3,534 of 8,25099.9% over 54 days$3.99/mo → $9.99/mo +150%
HostGatorHatchling332ms origin2778ms 0-250 ramp2,952 of 8,25099.87% over 54 days$3.75/mo → $10.99/mo +193%
GoDaddyEconomy369ms origin2941ms 0-250 ramp3,252 of 8,25099.83% over 54 days$5.99/mo → $11.99/mo +100%
iPage no longer soldGo Plan312ms origin885ms 0-100 ramp99 of 3,30099.709% over 54 daysNo canon join
Elementor Cloud shut downCloud Website164ms origin177ms 0-250 ramp16 of 8,25099.95% over 54 daysNo canon join

How to read this table. Each row reports the one plan of that host I hold a record for, named in the second column, so a figure is never borrowed from a sibling plan. TTFB is the United States measurement against a stock WordPress install, and the cell says whether it was taken at the origin server or at a CDN edge, because those are different measurements and a 32ms edge figure is not a 300ms origin one. Under full load ramp is the average across the whole ramp the host was tested on, not a reading at one concurrency, and the ramp is printed beside it: two hosts ran a shorter 0-100 ramp and are not directly comparable with the rest. Uptime is a measured window, and the window length is printed rather than rounded up to a year.

Why some cells are empty. A price appears only where the canon can join the measured plan to a verified price for the same plan. Where a host is measured on a plan whose price has not been captured under the same name, the cell reads No canon join instead of showing a neighbouring plan's price. That is the table refusing to guess, and it is deliberate.

Rocket.net: Rocket.net serves every request from Cloudflare Enterprise, so the only figure on file is an edge measurement. There is no origin test for this host.

WPX Hosting: Measured behind the WPX CDN. The canon holds no origin test for WPX.

Liquid Web: The review covers Liquid Web’s Nexcess managed WordPress line. The plan on file is the Managed VPS 4GB, so that is what this row reports.

SiteGround Cloud: The review covers SiteGround Cloud. The canon holds SiteGround’s shared plans only, so this row reports StartUp shared rather than the Cloud plan the review is about.

Contabo: Contabo bills in euro, and the figure is what Contabo charges rather than a conversion. It has since retired the S/M/L names: the plan measured as Cloud VPS S is sold today as Cloud VPS 4, and the number is the vCPU count.

Hostinger India: Hostinger India is priced in rupees and tested from Mumbai. It has no record in the benchmark canon, which measures from the United States and Europe.

Hosting.com: Hosting.com is the brand A2 Hosting became.

Bluehost: Bluehost renamed this tier Starter. It is the plan the canon prices.

GoDaddy: GoDaddy sells this tier as Economy. The pricing canon files it under Basic, which is the same plan.

iPage: iPage no longer sells hosting. The measurement stands; the price does not, and the canon refuses it.

Elementor Cloud: Elementor Cloud has been shut down. The review is kept because the migration question outlives the product.

What 28 Reviews Have in Common

Read one review and you get one host. Read the table above as a set and two patterns show up that no single review makes obvious.

The gap between the fastest and the slowest is larger than the gap between the cheapest and the most expensive

On an identical WordPress install with no CDN in front of it, the fastest of the 27 measured plans answers in 38ms and the slowest answers in 369ms. That is the same page, the same test, the same week. Under a full load ramp the spread widens rather than closes: 25ms against 3125ms. Hardware and how many sites are queued behind you for it explain almost all of that, and no caching plugin closes a gap that size.

The failure counts matter more than the averages. 11 of the 27 measured plans finished their ramp with zero failed requests. Three did not come close: Bluehost Basic dropped 3,534 of 8,250 requests, GoDaddy Economy 3,252, and HostGator Hatchling 2,952. A slow response is an inconvenience. A dropped request is a visitor who saw an error page.

The renewal trap is a billing model, not a price tier

It is tempting to read the renewal column as cheap hosts being greedy and premium hosts being honest. That is not what the data says. What separates them is whether the host runs an introductory rate at all. 6 of the 18 plans the canon can price never raise their rate, because they never discounted it: Kinsta, WP Engine, Rocket.net, WPX Hosting, Levamo and Contabo all charge on renewal exactly what they charge on day one, and not one of them is a shared plan.

All 8 shared plans the canon can price raise their rate, and the range is wide. The gentlest is GoDaddy Economy at +100% ($5.99/mo to $11.99/mo). The steepest is FastComet at +350% ($3.99/mo to $17.95/mo). ChemiCloud Starter, the plan most often recommended as the budget pick, goes $3.49/mo to $11.95/mo, a +242% rise. None of that is hidden. All of it is on the vendor's own pricing page, in the row underneath the one the advertising quotes.

Which is the honest way to frame the choice: not fast versus cheap, but whether you would rather pay one rate forever or a low rate now and a high one from the second term onward. Both are defensible. Only one of them is what the advertised number describes.

All 28 Reviews

Grouped by what the host actually sells, because a managed WordPress plan and a shared plan are not competing for the same buyer. Each review includes the speed benchmarks, the uptime record, support response tests, and the fine print you won't find on the provider's website.

Managed WordPress 7

Hosts that run WordPress and nothing else, and manage the stack for you. Two of them are measured at the CDN edge rather than at the origin, and the table says which.

Cover image for my Kinsta review

Kinsta Review 2026: 64ms on AMD EPYC 7502 vs the Real Cost Per Visit

Kinsta retired the plans this review was written against. Single 20GB is $29.17/mo flat, answered in 64ms at the origin with zero failed requests, and runs an AMD EPYC 7502, PassMark #248 of 5,999.

Cover image for my WP Engine review

WP Engine Review 2026: 242ms on Startup, 79 Blocked Plugins, and Who Should Pay This

WP Engine Startup answered in 242ms at the origin, slower than hosts a fraction of the price, and holds $25/mo flat. You pay for Genesis and Smart Plugin Manager on a 25,000-visit cap.

Cover image for my Rocket.net review

Rocket.net Review 2026: 32ms at the Cloudflare Enterprise Edge, and No Origin Test

Rocket.net serves every request from Cloudflare Enterprise, so 32ms is an edge measurement and there is no origin figure to publish. It held 66ms across a full load ramp with zero failures.

Cover image for my WPX Hosting review

WPX Hosting Review 2026: 32ms at the CDN Edge, and No Origin Test on File

WPX is measured behind its own CDN at 32ms, so there is no origin figure to publish. It held 162ms across a full load ramp, dropping 16 of 8,250 requests, at $29.99/mo flat.

Cover image for my Levamo review

Levamo Review 2026: 127ms on Starter, Flat $29/mo, Full Benchmark Data

Levamo Starter answered in 127ms at the origin and held 159ms across a full load ramp, dropping 8 of 8,250 requests, at 99.97% uptime. It charges $29/mo flat, with no introductory rate.

Cover image for my Namecheap EasyWP review

Namecheap EasyWP Review 2026: 344ms on Starter, and the Limits Nobody Lists

EasyWP Starter answered in 344ms at the origin and slowed to 1,852ms across a full load ramp, dropping 211 of 8,250 requests. $2.49/mo renews at $5.49, with no email hosting and no cPanel.

Cover image for my Liquid Web review

Liquid Web Review 2026: 74ms on VPS 4GB and 99.999% Uptime Measured

Liquid Web VPS 4GB answered in 74ms at the origin, held 91ms across a full load ramp with zero failures, and logged 99.999% uptime, the highest in my set. It renews at double the intro.

Cloud and VPS 8

A server slice of your own. Prices in this group are mostly flat, because there is usually no introductory rate to expire.

Cover image for my ScalaHosting review

ScalaHosting Review 2026: AMD EPYC 9474F Verified, 23ms Origin TTFB on Start

ScalaHosting publishes its exact CPU and I verified it with lscpu: AMD EPYC 9474F, PassMark #42 of 5,999. The Start managed VPS answered in 23ms and held 11ms across a full load ramp.

Cover image for my Cloudways review

Cloudways Review 2026: Four Servers on Three Clouds, Benchmarked and Tested Hands-On

Cloudways runs on DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr, AWS or GCP. The Vultr High Frequency build answered in 48ms at the origin and held 32ms across a full load ramp with zero failed requests.

Cover image for my SiteGround Cloud review

SiteGround Cloud Hosting Review 2026: Is the Premium Worth It?

SiteGround Cloud is the product this review covers. My benchmark set holds SiteGround's shared plans, where StartUp answered in 312ms at the origin and renews from $3.99 to $17.99, a +351% rise.

Cover image for my Contabo review

Contabo Review 2026: EUR 5.50 for 4 vCPU, and Where the Shared I/O Shows Up

Contabo Cloud VPS 4 gives 4 vCPU and 8GB for EUR 5.50/mo, billed in euro and flat on renewal. I measured 224ms at the origin and 190ms across a full load ramp, with 50 of 8,250 requests failing.

Cover image for my Kamatera review

Kamatera Review 2026: What a Real Production Server Actually Costs

Kamatera advertises $4/mo, but the configuration I actually needed cost $71/mo. The 4GB cloud server answered in 52ms at the origin and held 89ms across a full load ramp with zero failures.

Cover image for my Hetzner review

Hetzner Review 2026: 118ms on CPX11, and Pricing That Undercuts Every Managed Host

Hetzner CPX11 answered in 118ms at the origin from Europe and held 114ms across a full load ramp with zero failed requests. Unmanaged, so setup, security and backups are your job.

Cover image for my Vultr review

Vultr Review 2026: High Frequency vs Regular Compute, Full Benchmark Breakdown

Vultr High Frequency 1GB answered in 53ms at the origin and held 59ms across a full load ramp with zero failed requests, at 99.97% uptime. Regular Cloud Compute is the cheaper, slower line.

Cover image for my OVHcloud review

OVHcloud Review 2026: Strong Hardware, Dated Experience, Full Benchmark Data

OVHcloud VPS Value answered in 186ms at the origin from Europe and held 126ms across a full load ramp with zero failed requests. The control panel is dated and management is a paid add-on.

Shared hosting 11

The cheapest way in, and the tier where the renewal multiple does the real damage. Every one of these that the canon can price charges more at renewal than on the first term.

Cover image for my ChemiCloud review

ChemiCloud Review 2026: 84ms on Starter, and What the Renewal Actually Costs

ChemiCloud Starter answered in 84ms at the origin on LiteSpeed with zero failed requests across a full load ramp, at 99.97% uptime. The $3.49/mo intro renews at $11.95.

Cover image for my Hostinger review

Hostinger Review 2026: 276ms on Premium and a +268% Renewal

Hostinger Premium answered in 276ms at the origin and dropped 66 of 8,250 requests across a full load ramp. The $2.99/mo intro renews at $10.99, a +268% rise.

Cover image for my Hostinger India review

Hostinger India Review 2026: Mumbai TTFB, INR Pricing & Support

Hostinger India advertises ₹69/mo but renews at ₹293/mo once 18% GST lands, a 325% real increase. I measured TTFB from Mumbai across the shared plans.

Cover image for my FastComet review

FastComet Review 2026: 172ms on Plus and a +350% Renewal

FastComet Plus answered in 172ms at the origin with no CDN, at 99.96% uptime, but the $3.99/mo intro renews at $17.95, a +350% rise. 16 of 8,250 requests failed under a full load ramp.

Cover image for my Verpex review

Verpex Hosting Review 2026: 233ms on Bronze and 99.92% Uptime Measured

Verpex Bronze answered in 233ms at the origin with no CDN and slowed to 351ms across a full load ramp, dropping 31 of 8,250 requests. The $1.80/mo intro renews at $6.00, a +233% rise.

Cover image for my Hosting.com review

Hosting.com Review 2026: 172ms on StartUp, and the A2 Hosting Brand It Replaced

Hosting.com is the brand A2 Hosting became. StartUp answered in 172ms at the origin and held 109ms across a full load ramp, dropping 31 of 8,250 requests, at 99.91% uptime.

Cover image for my InMotion Hosting review

InMotion Hosting Review 2026: 210ms on Launch and 351ms Under a Full Load Ramp

InMotion Launch answered in 210ms at the origin and slowed to 351ms across a full load ramp, dropping 31 of 8,250 requests. The $4.79/mo intro renews at $14.99, a +213% rise.

Cover image for my DreamHost review

DreamHost Review 2026: The 97-Day Refund Is Real, the 230ms Is the Catch

DreamHost has the longest money-back guarantee I have found at 97 days, but Starter answered in 230ms at the origin on an Apache stack with no LiteSpeed, and slowed to 404ms under load.

Cover image for my Bluehost review

Bluehost Review 2026: 287ms, Newfold Ownership, and 43% of Requests Dropped

Bluehost Starter answered in 287ms at the origin and dropped 3,534 of 8,250 requests across a full load ramp, the worst in my set. I also map the Newfold ownership chain and the checkout costs.

Cover image for my HostGator review

HostGator Review 2026: 332ms, a 2016 Xeon, and 36% of Requests Dropped

HostGator Hatchling answered in 332ms at the origin and dropped 2,952 of 8,250 requests under load. Its Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 ranks #1,069 of 5,999 on PassMark. $3.75/mo renews at $10.99.

Cover image for my GoDaddy review

GoDaddy Hosting Review 2026: 369ms, a 2017 Xeon, and 39% of Requests Dropped

GoDaddy Economy answered in 369ms at the origin, the slowest in my set, and dropped 3,252 of 8,250 requests under a full load ramp. It runs an Intel Xeon Silver 4114, PassMark #1,468 of 5,999.

How these numbers were produced

Every plan in the table was bought at retail with my own money, on the term the vendor sells it on, with no vendor-supplied account and no press access. Each one runs the same install: WordPress with the default theme, no caching plugin, and any CDN switched off, so what the origin column reports is server speed and nothing else. Where a host cannot be tested that way, because it serves everything from a CDN edge, the row says CDN edge rather than pretending an origin figure exists.

Response times are a ten-location measurement and the table prints the United States figure. Load is a single ramp per plan, and the table reports the average across the whole ramp plus the number of requests that failed during it. It does not report a reading at one concurrency, because a per-concurrency export does not exist for these plans, and inventing one to fill the column is the thing this site is built not to do. Uptime is computed from real incident minutes over a measured window of 54 days, and that window length is printed in every cell rather than rounded up to a year.

Prices are read from each vendor's own pricing page and dated. They are never converted between currencies: Contabo bills in euro and the table says so. The full method is here, and every figure on this page can be traced to the record it came from.