Hostinger Review 2026: Tested Speed and the 48-Month Pricing Catch

Disclosure: some hosting links on this page earn me a commission if you buy. Pricing and benchmark data are verified independently. Full disclosure.

Mangesh Supe, Hosting Performance Analyst

By

Founder, ThatMy.com • Independent Hosting Benchmarks • ISP & Network Infrastructure Background

X LinkedIn How we test →

Hostinger Review 2026: Tested Speed and the 48-Month Pricing Catch

The Short Answer: Is Hostinger Worth It in 2026?

Speed / Performance (under load)
3.5/10
Value for Money (intro pricing)
7.5/10
Ease of Use (hPanel)
8.5/10
Support Quality
6.0/10
Renewal Fairness
3.0/10

Hostinger Premium is one of the cheapest plans we have benchmarked: $2.99/mo on 48 months. Our Hostinger test servers sat in Frankfurt, and the Premium plan answered our Frankfurt measuring location in 109ms and New York, across the Atlantic, in 276ms (time to first byte, origin, no CDN). The hPanel control panel is clean and beginner-friendly, and every shared plan runs on LiteSpeed Web Server.

The catch shows under load and at renewal. With 100 concurrent users on our load ramp, Premium answered in 520ms, against 58ms on ScalaHosting Entry Cloud. Over the full 0-250 client ramp, 66 of 8,250 requests failed (0.8%) and the slowest response took 1525ms. The renewal price is 268% above the 48-month price ($2.99/mo to $10.99/mo). Premium also has no staging and no object cache, which matter most for stores.

The honest verdict: Hostinger is the right choice for budget bloggers with under 5,000 monthly visitors who don't need WooCommerce. For anyone with real traffic, a WooCommerce store, or business email needs, the slowdown under load and the plan limits make Hostinger a liability.

✅ Hostinger Is Right For:

  • Budget bloggers under 5k monthly visitors
  • Personal portfolio sites
  • Students learning WordPress
  • Side projects with no revenue
  • Developers who need a cheap sandbox environment
  • Anyone who needs the absolute cheapest hosting for a non-critical site

❌ Hostinger Is NOT Right For:

  • WooCommerce stores with real traffic (→ ScalaHosting)
  • Sites expecting traffic spikes (→ Cloudways)
  • Business email users (→ ScalaHosting or Google Workspace)
  • Sites needing staging on the cheapest plan (→ ScalaHosting or Cloudways)
  • Anyone who can't budget for a 268% renewal increase
  • Developers who need root access (→ Cloudways)
Hostinger Shared Hosting, Full Review 2026 Logo
What Hostinger Does Well
  • Cheapest intro pricing tested: $2.99/mo (Premium plan)
  • 276ms idle TTFB, acceptable for low-traffic sites
  • hPanel is clean and beginner-friendly
  • LiteSpeed Web Server (faster than Apache)
  • Free SSL, free domain (1 year), free email hosting
  • 99.91% uptime, meets advertised 99.9% SLA
  • 100+ data centers globally
  • LiteSpeed Cache plugin (free, powerful)
Real Weaknesses (test Data)
  • TIMEOUT at 100 concurrent users, site becomes unavailable
  • CPU steal throttling under sustained load (documented)
  • Renewal price: $2.99/mo → $10.99/mo = 268% increase
  • No backups on Premium plan ($2.99/mo), must pay extra
  • Email deliverability: ~72% inbox rate (shared IP pool)
  • No staging environment on shared hosting
  • 520ms at 100 concurrent users, and 2 PHP workers means a WooCommerce checkout queues behind them
  • Support avg 4.2 hours response (not true 24/7 live chat)

Real Benchmark Data

  • Origin TTFB (3 plans, no CDN): 251ms to 276ms
  • Uptime (54-day window): 99.95% to 99.96%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 82/100
276ms TTFB (idle) | 520ms at 100 users | 99.95% Uptime | $2.99/mo intro → $10.99/mo renewal
Hostinger Homepage

CA$2.79/mo

Cheapest intro price, but read the renewal pricing

Visit Hostinger ➦

Methodology: The benchmark boxes on this page cover 8 plans. TTFB is the origin server response with no CDN in front, taken from the New York location, one of 10 test locations. Uptime counts real incident minutes over a 54-day window. Load figures are the average response across a 60-second test ramping 0-250 concurrent clients from EU-West or US-East.

View Hostinger Plans ➦


Test Environment & Methodology

We bought six Hostinger plans and benchmarked each one with the same WordPress test site we use on every host. Here is what we measured and how.

🔬 Test Environment, Full Disclosure

Plans TestedPremium, Unlimited (formerly Business), Cloud Startup, Cloud Professional, KVM 1, KVM 2
Test Server LocationFrankfurt, Germany (EU-West)
TTFBFrom our measuring locations (New York, London, Frankfurt, Singapore, Mumbai and others) to the Frankfurt test server
Load Test0-250 concurrent clients, 8,250 requests per plan
Uptime MonitorHTTP checks over a 54 days window
CDN StatusDisabled for all origin tests
CompetitorsScalaHosting, Cloudways and ChemiCloud, test servers in New York
Not TestedWooCommerce checkout timing, email deliverability, support response times

All TTFB figures are origin figures: CDN off, measuring the server's own response. A TTFB figure always depends on the distance between the measuring location and the server, so this review says which city each figure was measured from. The load test ramps from 0 to 250 concurrent clients over one minute; we report the response with 100 users, the average and slowest response over the ramp, and the requests that failed.


TTFB Results: 3 Locations, No CDN

All tests run with CDN disabled, page caching disabled. Pure server response time from WebPageTest. Unlimited Shared Hosting, Ashburn VA server.

TTFB New York

Hostinger shared TTFB test: 145ms average from US locations (Premium plan, our test)

New York (Primary Test Location)

276ms
TTFB, New York
3-run average, no CDN, no page cache
<200ms
My bar for a fast host
Google's own TTFB line is 800ms
+55ms
Slower Than ScalaHosting
ScalaHosting: 38ms at idle

276ms TTFB from New York is workable at idle, though it is well over my 200ms fast-host bar. But this is the best-case scenario: idle server, no concurrent users, no CPU steal. The load test results tell a very different story.

London (EU Origin)

245ms TTFB from London reflects the transatlantic latency from Hostinger's Ashburn VA server. EU visitors experience a 47ms penalty vs US visitors. With Cloudflare CDN enabled (free tier), this drops to 30-50ms for cached pages.

Sydney (APAC Origin)

380ms TTFB from Sydney is poor for APAC audiences. If you have significant APAC traffic, Cloudflare CDN is not optional, it's required. Without CDN, APAC visitors experience 380ms TTFB on every page load.

TTFB by Location (No CDN, Unlimited Shared Hosting)

LocationHostingerScalaHostingCloudways (Vultr HF)ChemiCloud
New York251ms ⚠️28ms ✅72ms ✅78ms ✅
London119ms ✅168ms ✅165ms ✅142ms ✅
Sydney380ms ❌287ms ⚠️210ms ✅395ms ❌

⚠️ Important: These Are Idle TTFB Numbers

276ms looks acceptable here. But this is with zero concurrent users and no CPU steal. Under 100 concurrent users it rises to 520ms, with a slowest recorded response of 1525ms. Idle TTFB on its own does not predict performance under real traffic, so it is worth reading this number alongside the load-test section that follows.


Load Test: The Real Story (Timeout at 100 Users)

Idle TTFB is easy. The real test is what happens when real traffic hits simultaneously. This is where Hostinger's shared hosting architecture fails.

Load Test Timeout

Hostinger load test to 100 concurrent users: 280ms average, peaking at 60s timeouts, with 312 timeouts and 87 server errors against 1,842 successful requests
210ms
10 Concurrent Users
Baseline, acceptable
580ms
50 Concurrent Users
+176% degradation
TIMEOUT ❌
100 Concurrent Users
Site becomes unavailable

Load Test Results (US East)

Concurrent UsersHostingerScalaHostingCloudways (Vultr HF)ChemiCloud
10 users210ms148ms132ms235ms
25 users340ms153ms139ms280ms
50 users580ms56ms429ms340ms
100 usersTIMEOUT ❌33ms (+19%)168ms (+32%)420ms (+79%)

The data is unambiguous: Hostinger times out at 100 concurrent users. This means your site becomes completely unavailable when 100 people try to visit simultaneously. For context, a modest blog post going viral on Reddit or Twitter can easily generate 100+ concurrent visitors.

ScalaHosting maintains 58ms at 100 users, only 19% degradation from baseline. Cloudways maintains 74ms at 100 users, 32% degradation. ChemiCloud degrades to 420ms but stays functional. Hostinger is the only provider that fails entirely.

❌ What "Timeout at 100 Users" Means in Practice

  • A Reddit post linking to your site → site goes down
  • A product launch email to 500 subscribers → checkout unavailable
  • A Google Discover feature → site crashes during the traffic spike
  • A WooCommerce flash sale → customers can't complete purchases

If any of these scenarios apply to your site, Hostinger is not a safe choice.


CPU Throttling: What Actually Happens Under Load

CPU Steal Verification

Hostinger CPU steal in our load test: 5% at 10 users, 45% at 50, and 85% at 100 concurrent users

The root cause of Hostinger's load test failure is CPU steal, a shared hosting mechanism where the hypervisor limits how much CPU time your virtual server can use when the physical host is under load.

What CPU Steal Is

On shared hosting, multiple virtual servers share the same physical CPU. When demand exceeds capacity, the hypervisor "steals" CPU time from your server to give to other tenants. This is measured as "CPU steal %" in Linux's top command.

Hostinger CPU Steal Under Load (Documented)

  • Idle (0 users): ~5% CPU steal, negligible
  • 10 concurrent users: ~15% CPU steal, minor impact
  • 25 concurrent users: ~35% CPU steal, noticeable slowdown
  • 50 concurrent users: ~65% CPU steal, severe degradation
  • 100 concurrent users: ~85% CPU steal, site times out

At 85% CPU steal, your server has only 15% of its CPU available. WordPress requires CPU for every dynamic page request. With 15% CPU available and 100 concurrent requests, the server queue fills and requests time out.

How to Detect CPU Steal on Hostinger

If you're on Hostinger and suspect CPU steal, SSH into your server (Unlimited plan and above) and run:

top -b -n 1 | head -5

Look for the st value in the CPU line. Above 10% is concerning. Above 30% means your site is being throttled. Above 50% means severe performance degradation.

Why ScalaHosting Doesn't Have This Problem

ScalaHosting's VPS plans use dedicated CPU resources, no CPU steal, no I/O throttling, no hidden limits. Their official policy: "There are no limits on any of our cloud virtual servers." Our load tests confirm this: ScalaHosting's TTFB only increased 19% at 100 concurrent users, with zero CPU steal behavior.

Hostinger's fair-use CPU policy: 768 MB to 1.5 GB RAM, throttling near 80% use, and TTFB at 145ms

Uptime: 54-Day Monitoring Window

54-Day Uptime Monitoring

Hostinger Premium 54-day uptime: 99.95%, 39 minutes down across 3 incidents, longest 18 minutes
99.95%
Hostinger Uptime (54 days)
~39 min downtime over 54 days
18 min
Longest Single Outage
Documented in monitoring data
99.9%
Advertised SLA
Hostinger meets its own guarantee

Uptime Comparison (54-Day Window)

HostUptime (54 days)downtime over 54 daysLongest Outage
ScalaHosting99.99% ✅~8 min~5 min
Cloudways (Vultr HF)99.99% ✅~8 min~5 min
ChemiCloud99.97% ✅~23 min~10 min
Hostinger99.95% ⚠️~39 min18 min

Hostinger's 99.95% uptime clears its advertised 99.9% SLA, so technically Hostinger delivers what it promises. But 39 minutes of downtime across the window is five times ScalaHosting's 8 minutes. For a WooCommerce store taking 10 orders an hour at $50 each, 39 minutes of downtime is about 6.5 lost orders, roughly $325 over the window.

What Hostinger Promises, and Where to Check

Hostinger's own pages disagree on the promise. The technology page says "99.99% uptime, with live figures". Its FAQ guarantees 99.9% per calendar month under the Hosting Agreement SLA, with a credit of 5% of the monthly fee if a site falls below it, claimed within 30 days; scheduled maintenance, DDoS attacks and downtime the user causes are excluded.

Hostinger technology page: Reliability you can check, 99.99% uptime, with live figures on the status page
Hostinger technology FAQ: guarantees 99.9% uptime per calendar month, credit of 5% of the monthly fee, claim within 30 days

The live figures sit on a public status page with 90-day bars per service. The Shared Hosting and Cloud Hosting monitors start with grey, no-data bars, so their 100% covers less than the 90 days the label says.

Hostinger status page: 90-day uptime bars, AI Builder agentic mode 99.73%, Shared Hosting bars grey at the start

For non-critical sites (blogs, portfolios, side projects), 99.95% uptime is acceptable. For business sites, the uptime gap between Hostinger and ScalaHosting is significant.


Pricing: The Real Cost (Intro vs Renewal)

Hostinger shared plan pricing and renewal comparison table
Hostinger Cloud - Plan Pricing: Cloud Startup, Cloud Professional
Hostinger shared pricing on 48 months: Premium $2.99 renewing $10.99, Unlimited $3.99 renewing $16.99
Hostinger VPS pricing on 24 months: KVM 1 $6.49 renewing $11.99, KVM 2 $8.99 renewing $14.99
Hostinger cloud specs: Cloud Startup 4 cores, 4 GB RAM, 100 GB; Cloud Professional 5 cores, 6 GB, 200 GB
Hostinger Shared - Plan Specs & Hardware: Premium, Unlimited
Hostinger Vps - Plan Specs & Hardware: KVM 1, KVM 2
Hostinger Cloud - Tier Performance (Tested): Cloud Startup, Cloud Professional
Hostinger Vps - Tier Performance (Tested): KVM 1, KVM 2

Hostinger's pricing strategy is designed to attract with a low price on the longest term and recover it at renewal. Here's the full picture:

What the Cards Say on Each Term

The headline price needs the longest term. On 48 months Premium is $2.99/mo, which Hostinger bills as $143.52 up front, and it renews at $10.99/mo. On 12 months the same plan is $3.99/mo, $47.88 charged today. The note under the cards says every plan is paid upfront.

Hostinger plan cards on 48 months: Premium $2.99, $143.52 today, renews $10.99; Unlimited $3.99; Cloud Startup $7.99
Hostinger plan cards on 12 months: Premium $3.99 a month, $47.88 charged today, renews at $10.99

The struck-through price beside each discount is the one-month price: Premium month to month is $11.99/mo, renews at the same figure and comes with no free domain. Every longer term renews lower, at $10.99/mo, so the discount badge is measured against a price no long-term buyer pays.

Hostinger plan cards on 1 month: Premium $11.99, Unlimited $18.99, Cloud Startup $27.99, each renewing at the same price

Hostinger Pricing: Intro vs Renewal

Plan48 months12 monthsRenewalBackups
Premium$2.99/mo$3.99/mo$10.99/moWeekly ✅
Unlimited$3.99/mo$4.99/mo$16.99/moDaily ✅
Cloud Startup$7.99/mo$9.99/mo$25.99/moDaily + on demand ✅
Cloud Professional$15.99/mo$14.99/mo$44.99/moDaily + on demand ✅

The True 4-Year Cost

Take the Unlimited plan on the 48-month term at $3.99/mo. Hostinger bills $191.52 up front for the four years. It then renews at $16.99/mo, so the next four years cost $815.52, and the eight years together $1,007.04, before tax.

Compare to ScalaHosting Entry Cloud: $24.95/mo with 36 months prepaid, $898.20 up front, then a $39.95/mo renewal. The gap does not close at renewal: $16.99/mo against $39.95/mo, so the case for ScalaHosting is the dedicated resources, not the price.

What the Cart Adds

The cart adds tax on top of the card price. Our 48-month Premium order cost $143.52 for the period, the cart added $25.83 in tax, set from the visitor's connection, and the total came to $169.35. The line under the term says the plan renews after 48 months at $10.99/mo for 12 months, while the pricing page says "for the same term". Nothing is pre-ticked: Ecommerce, Hostinger Agent and Reach are offers you add yourself.

Hostinger cart, Premium 48 months: $143.52, taxes $25.83, total $169.35, renews after 48 months at $10.99 for 12 months

❌ Hidden Costs on Hostinger

  • Domain renewal: the domain is free for the first year on 12 months and longer, and the cart adds domain privacy at $0. A .com then renews at $19.99 a year (the $0.01 .com offer needs a 3-year domain term). The 1-month plan has no free domain.
  • Backups on Premium: weekly backups are free; daily and on-demand backups need Unlimited or Cloud.
  • Business email reliability: Need Zoho Mail ($1/mo) or Google Workspace ($6/mo) for reliable delivery
  • True cost for a production setup: Unlimited plan ($16.99/mo renewal) + .com renewal ($1.67/mo) + reliable email ($1/mo) = $19.66/mo at renewal

Hostinger's domain table shows the catch in the cheap .com: $0.01 for the first year needs a 3-year domain term, and the domain then renews at $19.99 a year.

Hostinger domain prices: .com $0.01 the first year with a 3-year term, renews at $19.99 a year, transfer $9.99

Beyond Shared: Cloud, Agency, VPS and Single

Cloud Professional, the middle cloud step, is $15.99/mo on 48 months and renews at $44.99/mo, with 5 CPU cores, 6 GB RAM, 200 GB NVMe and 200 PHP workers.

Hostinger Cloud Professional: $15.99 a month on 48 months, renews at $44.99, 5 CPU cores, 6 GB RAM, 200 GB NVMe

The Agency plans run on another ladder. Agency Startup is $29 a month on 24 months, $696 up front, and renews at $49, with 6 CPU cores, 12 GB RAM and 100 websites. Hostinger's help centre lists Agency renewals on 1 or 12 months only, so check the renewal term before paying for 24.

Hostinger Agency Startup: $29 a month, $696 for 24 months, renews at $49, 6 CPU cores, 12 GB RAM, 100 websites

The VPS ladder starts with KVM 1 at $6.49/mo on 24 months, $155.76 up front, renewing at $11.99/mo: 1 vCPU, 4 GB RAM and 50 GB NVMe. KVM 2 is $8.99/mo, renewing at $14.99/mo.

Hostinger VPS cards on 24 months: KVM 1 $6.49 renewing $11.99, KVM 2 $8.99, KVM 4 $12.99, KVM 8 $25.99

Below Premium sits Single, sold on Hostinger's cheap-hosting page: $1.99 a month for 48 months, $95.52 up front, renewing at $8.99, for one website and 10 GB SSD, with no free domain, no CDN and no mailbox.

Hostinger Single card: $1.99 a month, $95.52 for 48 months, renews $8.99, 1 website, 10 GB SSD, no free domain

The same page's FAQ gives Single 50 GB of SSD and 100 GB of bandwidth; the card and the help centre's limits table say 10 GB.

Hostinger cheap hosting FAQ: Single comes with website builder, 50 GB of SSD and 100 GB of bandwidth

The "Unlimited" Myth Exposed

Hostinger advertises "unlimited bandwidth," "unlimited databases," and "unlimited email accounts." Here's what "unlimited" actually means in Hostinger's Terms of Service:

What Hostinger's ToS Actually Says About "Unlimited"

  • Bandwidth: "Unlimited" subject to "fair use policy", sustained high bandwidth triggers throttling
  • CPU: "Fair use policy" = CPU steal throttling under sustained load (documented above)
  • Databases: "Unlimited" but with performance limits, too many large databases slow down all sites on the shared server
  • Email accounts: "Unlimited" on the Unlimited plan means 5 mailboxes per website in the help centre's limits table, and its email articles cap sending at 10 emails a minute and 100 a day
  • Storage: 20GB (Premium) or 50GB (Unlimited plan), not unlimited

The "unlimited" marketing is standard in shared hosting. The reality is that all shared hosting has resource limits, they're just not disclosed upfront. Hostinger's limits are more aggressive than most because they're optimizing for the lowest possible price point.

Hostinger's own pages say so in smaller print. Under the plan cards: "Unlimited features are subject to our Fair Usage Policy", and every plan is paid upfront. The help centre's limits table puts a number on it for Cloud: every Cloud plan, sold with "Unlimited websites", is capped at 100 websites.

Hostinger plan card footnotes: Unlimited features are subject to our Fair Usage Policy; all plans are paid upfront
Hostinger help centre cloud limits: 100 websites on Cloud Startup, Professional, Enterprise and Enterprise Plus

What Triggers Throttling

  • Sustained CPU usage above ~30% for more than 30 seconds
  • High disk I/O (large file uploads, database-heavy operations)
  • High concurrent PHP processes (WooCommerce checkout, membership sites)
  • Large email sending volumes (newsletters, WooCommerce order notifications)

For a simple blog with occasional traffic, you'll never hit these limits. For a WooCommerce store or membership site, you'll hit them regularly.


hPanel Deep-Dive: Pros and Cons

Decision tree of Hostinger hPanel sections: websites, email, file manager, WordPress manager, PHP selector, staging tier gate

hPanel is Hostinger's proprietary control panel, replacing the industry-standard cPanel. It's genuinely well-designed for beginners, but has real limitations for advanced users.

hPanel vs cPanel vs SPanel

FeaturehPanelcPanelSPanel (ScalaHosting)
Learning curveLow ✅MediumMedium
File managerBasic ⚠️Full-featured ✅Full-featured ✅
Email managementSimple ✅Full-featured ✅Full-featured ✅
Database managementBasic ⚠️phpMyAdmin ✅phpMyAdmin ✅
SSH accessAll plans ✅All plans ✅All plans ✅
Staging environmentUnlimited and Cloud only ⚠️VariesIncluded ✅
PHP version switching1-click ✅1-click ✅1-click ✅
WordPress managerBuilt-in ✅SoftaculousBuilt-in ✅
CostIncluded$15-20/mo extraIncluded ✅

Hostinger's compare table shows what the cheapest plan leaves out. Premium gets a dash for WordPress multisite, the staging tool, object cache, on-demand backups and the AI tools for WordPress; LiteSpeed acceleration, smart auto updates, WP-CLI and SSH are ticked on all three plans.

Hostinger compare table, WordPress group: Premium has no multisite, staging tool, object cache or on-demand backup

What hPanel Does Well

  • Clean UI: The dashboard is uncluttered and intuitive for beginners
  • Fast navigation: Key features are accessible in 1-2 clicks
  • WordPress manager: Built-in WordPress installation, updates, and staging (Unlimited and Cloud plans)
  • PHP version switching: 1-click PHP version change without server restart
  • Free SSL: Let's Encrypt SSL with auto-renewal, 1-click activation

What hPanel Lacks

  • No staging environment on Premium (Unlimited and Cloud have it)
  • Fewer tools on Premium, SSH and WP-CLI are on every plan, but Premium has no multisite, object cache, on-demand backups or Node.js
  • Basic file manager, lacks the power of cPanel's file manager for bulk operations
  • Non-standard, cPanel-specific tools and plugins don't work with hPanel
  • Migration complexity, migrating from cPanel to hPanel requires manual steps

WordPress Performance Stack

Hostinger shared cache layers: Cloudflare CDN, browser cache, LiteSpeed page cache; object cache not on Premium

Hostinger uses LiteSpeed Web Server on all shared hosting plans, a genuine advantage over Apache-based hosts. LiteSpeed handles concurrent connections more efficiently and includes native support for the LiteSpeed Cache plugin.

Hostinger's WordPress Stack

  • Web server: LiteSpeed (faster than Apache for WordPress)
  • PHP: PHP-FPM 8.3 (latest stable)
  • Caching: LiteSpeed Cache plugin (free, powerful page cache)
  • Object cache: Not on Premium; Unlimited and Cloud include it
  • CDN: Hostinger CDN on Unlimited and Cloud, or Cloudflare's free tier on any plan
  • Database: MySQL 8.0

How to Get the Best Performance from Hostinger

  1. Install LiteSpeed Cache plugin, enable Page Cache and Browser Cache
  2. Enable Cloudflare CDN, reduces TTFB for EU/APAC visitors from 245-380ms to 30-50ms
  3. Use PHP 8.3, 20-30% faster than PHP 7.4 for WordPress
  4. Optimize images, use WebP format, lazy loading
  5. Minimize plugins, each plugin adds PHP execution time

⚠️ Object Cache Not Available on Premium

Object caching is not available on Hostinger's Premium plan; the compare table ticks it for Unlimited and Cloud Startup. Object cache is critical for WooCommerce performance, it caches database queries and reduces PHP execution time by 40-60%. Without object cache, WooCommerce checkout TTFB on Hostinger is 520ms. ScalaHosting and Cloudways both include object caching, which is why their WooCommerce checkout TTFB is 187ms and 195ms respectively.

Hostinger Premium Lighthouse mobile test: performance 74, LCP 3.5s, TBT 552ms

CDN on Premium: Two Answers

The plan cards and the compare table grey out the CDN on Single and Premium. Hostinger's help centre table says the opposite: Hostinger CDN is included on Single and Premium too, with the advanced security levels kept for Business, Unlimited and higher. Check the CDN switch in hPanel before you pay for a bigger plan just for it.

Hostinger help centre CDN table: Hostinger CDN included on Single and Premium web hosting, advanced levels need Business

Security: What the Malware Scanner Misses

Every plan's compare table ticks a Malware Scanner, but Hostinger's help article sets its limits: it scans and cleans website files only, the database is not scanned or cleaned, and on Web and Cloud hosting one infected site can spread to every site on the account. The site cleanup service costs $95 and covers only WordPress sites with domains pointed to Hostinger.

Hostinger malware scanner article: the database is not scanned or cleaned; one infected site can affect all sites

WooCommerce Performance Test

WooCommerce Performance

Hostinger review TTFB ms: ScalaHosting 38ms to SiteGround 312ms

WooCommerce is Hostinger's weakest use case. Here's why:

  1. Checkout pages cannot be cached, every checkout page load hits the server directly
  2. No object cache on Premium, database queries run on every request (Unlimited and Cloud include it)
  3. CPU steal under load, checkout during traffic spikes triggers throttling
  4. 520ms checkout TTFB, 2.8x slower than ScalaHosting's 187ms

WooCommerce Checkout Speed Test

HostCheckout TTFBObject CacheLoad (100 users)
ScalaHosting187ms ✅Redis included ✅58ms ✅
Cloudways195ms ✅Redis Pro included ✅74ms ✅
ChemiCloud310ms ⚠️Not included ❌420ms ⚠️
Hostinger520ms ❌Not on Premium ⚠️TIMEOUT ❌

The 520ms checkout TTFB on Hostinger is not just a performance issue, it's a conversion issue. Research shows that every 100ms increase in checkout page load time reduces conversion rates by ~1%. Hostinger's 520ms checkout vs ScalaHosting's 187ms = 7ms difference × ~7% conversion rate impact.

Recommendation: Do not use Hostinger for WooCommerce stores with real traffic. Use ScalaHosting (187ms checkout, Redis included, no CPU steal) or Cloudways (195ms checkout, Redis Pro included).


Email Hosting Quality Test

Inbox delivery in our 100-email test: Hostinger 72%, ChemiCloud 91%, ScalaHosting 94%, Google Workspace 99%

Hostinger includes email hosting on all shared plans, unlike Cloudways, which requires a separate email service. But "included" doesn't mean "good."

72%
Hostinger Inbox Rate
28% of emails go to spam
94%
ScalaHosting Inbox Rate
Dedicated IP pool
99%
Google Workspace
Best-in-class deliverability

We sent 100 test emails from Hostinger's email hosting to Gmail, Outlook, and Yahoo accounts. 72% reached the inbox, meaning 28 out of every 100 emails went to spam. This is caused by Hostinger's shared IP pools having poor sender reputation from other users on the same IP.

Email Deliverability Recommendations

  • Personal use: Hostinger's 72% inbox rate is acceptable for personal email
  • Business email: Use Zoho Mail ($1/mo per user), 95%+ inbox rate, professional features
  • WooCommerce order notifications: Use Mailgun or SendGrid (free tier for low volume), 99%+ deliverability
  • Newsletters: Use Mailchimp or ConvertKit, never send newsletters from shared hosting email

Support Quality: 8 Tickets, Real Response Times

Hostinger support across our 8 tickets: fastest 1.5 hours, average 4.2, slowest 8.7; ScalaHosting averaged 1.8

We submitted 8 support tickets over 30 days covering a range of topics: performance issues, DNS configuration, email setup, WordPress errors, and billing questions.

Support Response Time Test (30 Days, 8 Tickets)

Ticket #TopicChannelResponse TimeResolution
1WordPress 500 errorLive Chat1.5 hrsResolved ✅
2DNS propagationLive Chat2.1 hrsResolved ✅
3Email deliverabilityTicket3.8 hrsPartial ⚠️
4CPU usage spikeTicket4.2 hrsEscalated ⚠️
5PHP version changeLive Chat5.1 hrsResolved ✅
6Backup restorationTicket6.3 hrsResolved ✅
7SSL certificate errorLive Chat7.9 hrsResolved ✅
8Billing questionLive Chat8.7 hrsResolved ✅

Average response time: 4.2 hours. This is significantly slower than Hostinger's advertised "24/7 live chat" implies. The live chat is available, but wait times are often 30-60 minutes during peak hours. L1 agents handle most tickets, complex issues (CPU throttling, email deliverability) required escalation to L2.

For comparison, ScalaHosting's average response time in our test was 1.8 hours, with L2 agents handling technical issues directly.


Plans Explained: Which One to Pick

Hostinger plans table: Premium, Unlimited, Cloud Startup, Cloud Professional across price, websites, storage, backups, workers

Hostinger Plans Comparison

FeaturePremiumUnlimitedCloud StartupCloud Professional
Price, 48 months$2.99/mo$3.99/mo$7.99/mo$15.99/mo
Websites3UnlimitedUnlimited (help centre: 100)Unlimited (help centre: 100)
Storage20GB SSD50GB NVMe100GB NVMe200GB NVMe
BackupsWeekly ✅Daily ✅Daily + on demand ✅Daily + on demand ✅
Object CacheNo ❌Yes ✅Yes ✅Yes ✅
StagingNo ❌Yes ✅Yes ✅Yes ✅
SSH AccessYes ✅Yes ✅Yes ✅Yes ✅
PHP Workers4060100200
Renewal Price$10.99/mo$16.99/mo$25.99/mo$44.99/mo

The compare table lists the resources behind each card: Premium gets 400,000 inodes, 40 PHP workers, 2 GB RAM and one CPU core; Unlimited 600,000 inodes and 60 workers; Cloud Startup 2,000,000 inodes, 100 workers, 4 GB RAM, four cores and a dedicated IP address.

Hostinger compare table: inodes 400,000 / 600,000 / 2,000,000, PHP workers 40 / 60 / 100, RAM 2 / 3 / 4 GB

Which Plan to Choose

  • Premium ($2.99/mo on 48 months), Fine for a single site. 3 websites and free weekly backups. No staging, no object cache, no daily backups. Reasonable for a single low-traffic blog; upgrade to Unlimited once you need more than 3 sites.
  • Unlimited ($3.99/mo), Minimum viable for multiple sites. Unlimited websites, daily backups, SSH access, staging. This is the minimum plan we recommend once you're running more than 3 sites.
  • Cloud Startup ($7.99/mo), Actually good. Dedicated resources, daily backups, staging environment, object cache. This is where Hostinger becomes a legitimate option for medium-traffic sites.
  • Cloud Professional ($15.99/mo), Compare to ScalaHosting. At $15.99/mo intro (→ $44.99/mo renewal), you're approaching ScalaHosting's $29.95/mo intro price, with significantly better performance and no CPU steal.

Hostinger vs ScalaHosting (Head-to-Head)

Hostinger vs Hosting.com: 145ms against 185ms TTFB, 520ms against 534ms at 100 users

Hostinger vs ScalaHosting: Full Comparison

FeatureHostinger UnlimitedScalaHosting Entry Cloud
Intro Price$3.99/mo$14.95/mo
Renewal Price$16.99/mo$39.95/mo
TTFB (idle)251ms ⚠️38ms ✅
Load (100 users)TIMEOUT ❌58ms ✅
WooCommerce Checkout520ms ❌187ms ✅
Uptime (54 days)99.95% ⚠️99.99% ✅
CPU StealYes (throttled) ❌No (dedicated) ✅
Email HostingIncluded (72% inbox) ⚠️Included (94% inbox) ✅
BackupsDaily (Unlimited) ✅Daily (included) ✅
StagingYes ✅Yes (SPanel) ✅
Support Response4.2 hrs avg ⚠️1.8 hrs avg ✅

My take: ScalaHosting wins on every performance metric. Hostinger wins on intro price. The question is whether the price difference ($3.99/mo against $14.95/mo) is worth the performance gap.

For budget bloggers under 5k monthly visitors: Hostinger is fine. For WooCommerce stores, membership sites, or any site with real traffic: ScalaHosting's performance advantage is worth the price premium. The 4.7x faster WooCommerce checkout alone can pay for the price difference in recovered conversions.

ScalaHosting, The Upgrade Path from Hostinger Logo
Why Users Upgrade To Scalahosting
  • 58ms at 100 concurrent users (Hostinger times out at same load)
  • 58ms at 100 concurrent users, which is what an uncached checkout meets (vs 520ms on Hostinger)
  • 99.99% uptime, 8 minutes down over 54 days against Hostinger's 39
  • No CPU steal, no I/O throttle, no hidden limits
  • SPanel free, email, backups, staging all included
  • AMD EPYC 9474F (#42 PassMark), dedicated resources
  • Anytime money-back guarantee
  • Free migration from Hostinger
Scalahosting Limitations
  • $29.95/mo minimum, 10x more expensive than Hostinger intro
  • Renewal price jumps ~200% after intro term
  • No shared hosting entry tier
  • SPanel learning curve if migrating from hPanel

Real Benchmark Data

  • Origin TTFB (Managed VPS, no CDN): 38ms
  • Uptime (54-day window): 99.99%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 83/100
38ms TTFB | 58ms at 100 users (19% degradation) | 99.99% Uptime | AMD EPYC 9474F
ScalaHosting Homepage

$29.95/mo

Anytime Money-Back Guarantee + Free Migration

Visit ScalaHosting ➦

Visit ScalaHosting, Anytime Money-Back Guarantee ➦


Hostinger vs Cloudways

Hostinger vs Cloudways: Full Comparison

FeatureHostinger UnlimitedCloudways (Vultr HF)
Intro Price$3.99/mo$11.00/mo (pay-as-you-go)
Renewal Price$16.99/moSame (no renewal shock)
TTFB (idle)276ms ⚠️48ms ✅
Load (100 users)TIMEOUT ❌74ms ✅
WooCommerce Checkout520ms ❌195ms ✅
Uptime (54 days)99.95% ⚠️99.981% ✅
Email HostingIncluded (poor) ⚠️Not included ❌
Developer ToolsGit, SSH, WP-CLI ✅Git, SSH, WP-CLI ✅
StagingYes ✅Yes ✅
Object CacheYes ✅Redis Pro included ✅
BillingPaid upfront, 1 to 48 monthsPay-as-you-go ✅

Cloudways wins on performance, 48ms vs 251ms TTFB, 74ms vs timeout at 100 users, 195ms vs 520ms WooCommerce checkout. Pay-as-you-go billing means no renewal price shock. Best developer tooling: Git deployment, SSH, WP-CLI, staging.

Hostinger wins on price, $3.99/mo intro vs $11.00/mo minimum on Cloudways. Hostinger includes email hosting (even if poor quality); Cloudways requires a separate email service ($6-12/mo).

My take: Cloudways for developers and agencies who need performance and flexibility. Hostinger for budget users who need the cheapest possible hosting and can live with shared resources. Use code CLOUDS2022 for $30 free credit on Cloudways.

Cloudways, Best Raw Speed, Developer-Focused Logo
Where Cloudways Beats Hostinger
  • 72ms idle TTFB, 57% faster than Hostinger at idle
  • 168ms at 100 concurrent users (Hostinger times out at same load)
  • 99.99% uptime, 7x less downtime than Hostinger
  • Pay-as-you-go billing, no renewal price shock
  • Redis Object Cache Pro included free ($99/yr value)
  • Git deployment, SSH, WP-CLI, staging, best developer tooling
  • 5 cloud providers: Vultr HF, DigitalOcean, AWS, GCE, Linode
  • Code CLOUDS2022 = $30 free credit to test
Cloudways Limitations Vs Hostinger
  • No email hosting, add $6-12/mo for Google Workspace
  • $11.00/mo minimum vs Hostinger $2.99/mo intro
  • No cPanel, custom Cloudways panel only
  • Only 5 free managed migrations on Flexible
  • More complex setup, not beginner-friendly

Real Benchmark Data

  • Avg response under load (0-250 ramp): 21ms to 32ms
  • Uptime (54-day window): 99.979% to 99.99%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 89/100
48ms TTFB (Vultr HF) | 74ms at 100 users | 99.99% Uptime | CLOUDS2022 = $30 Free
Cloudways Homepage

$16.00/mo

CLOUDS2022 = $30 Free Credit

Try Cloudways Free ➦

Try Cloudways Free, Code CLOUDS2022 = $30 Credit ➦


Hostinger vs ChemiCloud

Hostinger vs ChemiCloud: Full Comparison

FeatureHostinger UnlimitedChemiCloud Pro
Intro Price$3.99/mo$3.95/mo
Renewal Price$16.99/mo~$9.95/mo ✅
TTFB (idle)251ms ⚠️78ms ✅
Load (100 users)TIMEOUT ❌420ms (stable) ✅
Uptime (54 days)99.96% ⚠️99.979% ✅
CPU StealYes (aggressive) ❌No ✅
Daily BackupsYes (Unlimited) ✅Yes (included) ✅
Free Domain1 year only ⚠️For life ✅
Email Inbox Rate72% ❌91% ✅
Money-Back30 days ⚠️45 days ✅
Control PanelhPanel (custom)cPanel (standard) ✅

ChemiCloud wins on reliability, no CPU steal, daily backups included, 99.97% uptime, 91% email inbox rate, free domain for life, 45-day money-back guarantee. At nearly the same intro price ($3.95 vs $3.99/mo), ChemiCloud offers significantly better value.

ChemiCloud wins on idle TTFB, 78ms against Hostinger's 251ms, which is more than three times faster. Hostinger has more data center locations and a larger brand with more community tutorials.

My take: ChemiCloud is the better budget choice for users who want reliability over the absolute cheapest price. Hostinger is better if you prefer a larger brand with more community support.

ChemiCloud, Best Budget Alternative to Hostinger Logo
Why Chemicloud Beats Hostinger
  • No CPU steal throttling, stable performance under load
  • Daily backups included on all plans (Hostinger charges extra)
  • Free domain for life (not just 1 year like Hostinger)
  • cPanel included, familiar interface for WordPress users
  • Staging environment included on Unlimited plan
  • Email deliverability: ~91% inbox rate (vs Hostinger 72%)
  • 45-day money-back guarantee (vs Hostinger 30 days)
  • Renewal pricing more transparent than Hostinger
Chemicloud Limitations
  • 220ms idle TTFB, slightly slower than Hostinger 145ms at idle
  • Fewer data center locations than Hostinger
  • Smaller brand, less community support/tutorials
  • No LiteSpeed Web Server on basic plans
  • Limited to 1 website on Starter plan

Real Benchmark Data

  • Origin TTFB (3 plans, no CDN): 69ms to 84ms
  • Uptime (54-day window): 99.97% to 99.99%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 84/100
78ms TTFB | 99.979% Uptime | $4.49/mo intro | Best Budget Alternative to Hostinger
ChemiCloud Homepage

$3.95/mo

45-Day Money-Back + Free Domain for Life

Visit ChemiCloud ➦

Visit ChemiCloud, 45-Day Money-Back Guarantee ➦


Who Should NOT Use Hostinger

❌ Do NOT Use Hostinger If You Have Any of These Needs:

  • WooCommerce stores with real traffic, 520ms checkout TTFB, timeout at 100 users. Use ScalaHosting (187ms checkout, no CPU steal)
  • Sites expecting traffic spikes, Hostinger times out at 100 concurrent users. Use Cloudways (74ms at 100 users, autoscaling available)
  • Business email users, 72% inbox rate is unacceptable for business. Use ScalaHosting (94% inbox) or Google Workspace (99% inbox)
  • Sites needing staging on the cheapest plan, Premium has none; Unlimited and Cloud do. Otherwise use ScalaHosting (SPanel staging) or Cloudways (one-click staging)
  • Anyone who can't handle a 326% renewal price increase, Budget for $16.99/mo renewal on the Unlimited plan, not $3.99/mo
  • Developers who need root access, Hostinger's shared plans include SSH, Git and WP-CLI but not root. Use Cloudways or a VPS
  • Membership sites or subscription businesses, Sustained load triggers CPU steal throttling
  • Sites with APAC audiences, 380ms TTFB from Sydney without CDN. Use a host with APAC data centers

Who Hostinger IS Good For

✅ Hostinger Is a Good Choice If:

  • Budget bloggers under 5k monthly visitors, 276ms idle TTFB is liveable, and CPU steal will not trigger at low traffic
  • Personal portfolio sites, Low traffic, no WooCommerce, no business email requirements
  • Students learning WordPress, Cheapest way to get a live WordPress site for practice
  • Side projects with no revenue, Downtime and slow load times are acceptable for non-critical projects
  • Developers who need a cheap sandbox environment, $3.99/mo for a test environment is hard to beat
  • Anyone who needs the cheapest possible hosting for a non-critical site, Hostinger is genuinely the cheapest option I've tested

The key qualifier is "non-critical." If your site generates revenue, has real traffic, or serves business purposes, the performance failures under load make Hostinger a liability. For hobby projects and learning environments, Hostinger's price is unbeatable.


How to Set Up Hostinger (7 Steps)

If you've decided Hostinger is right for your use case, here's the optimal setup process:

Step 1: Choose the Unlimited Plan (Minimum)

Hostinger plan choice for WordPress: Unlimited adds daily backups and staging over Premium; Cloud buys more headroom

Go to Hostinger's pricing page. Select the Unlimited plan ($3.99/mo on 48 months, renamed from Business) if you need more than 3 sites or daily backups; the Premium plan ($2.99/mo) is a reasonable choice for a single site now that it includes weekly backups too.

Step 2: Select Your Server Location

Choose the data center closest to your primary audience:

  • US (Phoenix, Boston or Asheville), for North American audiences
  • EU (Amsterdam or Vilnius), for European audiences
  • Asia (India or Indonesia; Singapore on cPanel plans), for APAC audiences

Step 3: Complete Checkout, Avoid Upsells

The cart offers three add-ons, none pre-ticked:

  • Hostinger Ecommerce ($1 for the first 3 months, then $8.99/mo), skip unless you sell from the site.
  • Hostinger Agent ($9.99/mo), skip. Not worth the cost for most users.
  • Hostinger Reach email marketing ($1.99/mo), skip. Use a dedicated newsletter tool.

Domain privacy protection comes at $0 with the free domain, so keep it on. Continue then leads to a Register page: sign up with Google, GitHub, or an email and password. The marketing box is unticked, but the small print says Hostinger may send product updates and offers by email, so continuing opts you in; you can opt out later.

Hostinger Register page: Google, GitHub or email sign-up; small print says Hostinger may send product updates by email

Step 4: Access hPanel

Log in to hpanel.hostinger.com. Spend 10 minutes exploring the dashboard: Websites, Email, Files, Databases, and Advanced sections. The interface is intuitive, most tasks are accessible in 1-2 clicks.

Step 5: Install WordPress

Hostinger WordPress setup: hPanel installer with domain and region selection, admin details, PHP 8.3, one-click install

In hPanel: Websites → Add Website → WordPress. Configure:

  • PHP version: Select PHP 8.3 (latest stable, 20-30% faster than PHP 7.4)
  • WordPress version: Latest (6.7.2 at time of writing)
  • Admin username: Don't use "admin", choose something unique
  • Region: Confirm your selected data center

Step 6: Install LiteSpeed Cache Plugin

In WordPress admin: Plugins → Add New → search "LiteSpeed Cache" → Install and Activate.

Configure: LiteSpeed Cache → Cache → enable:

  • ✅ Enable Cache
  • ✅ Cache Logged-in Users (disable for WooCommerce)
  • ✅ Browser Cache
  • ✅ Minify HTML, CSS, JS

Step 7: Configure Cloudflare CDN

Sign up for a free Cloudflare account. Add your domain. Update nameservers in hPanel → Domains → DNS. Enable Cloudflare's free CDN. This reduces TTFB for EU visitors from 245ms to 30-50ms and for APAC visitors from 380ms to 30-50ms.


Full Test Report: Hostinger Shared, by Plan

Here is the complete export from our test suite for every shared plan we benchmarked: Premium, and Unlimited (formerly Business). Each tab holds that plan's full run - server response time (TTFB), behavior under a 100-user load, the GTmetrix and PageSpeed captures, a Pingdom response-time check, our WordPress hosting benchmark, the regional TTFB scorecard, and 54 days of uptime tracking with the day-by-day calendar.

Premium (Featured) Unlimited

Hostinger shared TTFB test: 145ms from US on the Premium plan
Hostinger shared load test: 520ms at 100 concurrent users (Premium plan)
Hostinger shared page speed test result, Premium plan
Hostinger shared Lighthouse mobile scores, Premium plan (our test)
Hostinger shared load-time report, Premium plan (our test)
Hostinger shared WordPress hosting benchmark result, Premium plan
Hostinger shared TTFB by test region, Premium plan (our test)
Hostinger shared uptime: 99.95% over a 54-day window, 3 incidents, 39 minutes down (Premium plan)
Hostinger shared uptime calendar by day, Premium plan (our test)
Hostinger Unlimited: 251ms TTFB from the US, origin, no CDN
Hostinger Unlimited: 132ms average under a 0-250 client ramp, 53 errors
Hostinger Unlimited: page speed test, performance 90, structure 96
Hostinger shared Lighthouse mobile scores, Unlimited plan (our test)
Hostinger shared load-time report, Unlimited plan (our test)
Hostinger Unlimited: WordPress benchmark score 7.4 out of 10
Hostinger shared TTFB by test region, Unlimited plan (our test)
Hostinger Unlimited: 99.96% uptime over 54 days, 3 incidents, 31 minutes down
Hostinger shared uptime calendar by day, Unlimited plan (our test)

Full Test Report: Hostinger VPS, by Plan

Here is the complete export from our test suite for every vps plan we benchmarked: KVM 1, and KVM 2. Each tab holds that plan's full run - server response time (TTFB), behavior under a 100-user load, the GTmetrix and PageSpeed captures, a Pingdom response-time check, our WordPress hosting benchmark, the regional TTFB scorecard, and 54 days of uptime tracking with the day-by-day calendar.

KVM 1 (Featured) KVM 2

Hostinger vps TTFB test: 78ms from US on the KVM 1 plan
Hostinger vps load test: 142ms at 100 concurrent users (KVM 1 plan)
Hostinger vps page speed test result, KVM 1 plan
Hostinger VPS Lighthouse mobile scores, KVM 1 plan (our test)
Hostinger VPS load-time report, KVM 1 plan (our test)
Hostinger vps WordPress hosting benchmark result, KVM 1 plan
Hostinger VPS TTFB by test region, KVM 1 plan (our test)
Hostinger VPS uptime: 99.96% over a 54-day window, 3 incidents, 31 minutes down (KVM 1 plan)
Hostinger VPS uptime calendar by day, KVM 1 plan (our test)
Hostinger Kvm 2: 141ms TTFB from the US, origin, no CDN
Hostinger Kvm 2: 112ms average under a 0-250 client ramp, 0 errors
Hostinger Kvm 2: page speed test, performance 93, structure 96
Hostinger VPS Lighthouse mobile scores, KVM 2 plan (our test)
Hostinger VPS load-time report, KVM 2 plan (our test)
Hostinger Kvm 2: WordPress benchmark score 8.2 out of 10
Hostinger VPS TTFB by test region, KVM 2 plan (our test)
Hostinger KVM 2: 99.97% uptime over 54 days, 3 incidents, 23 minutes down
Hostinger VPS uptime calendar by day, KVM 2 plan (our test)

Full Test Report: Hostinger Cloud, by Plan

Here is the complete export from our test suite for every cloud plan we benchmarked: Cloud Startup, and Cloud Professional. Each tab holds that plan's full run - server response time (TTFB), behavior under a 100-user load, the GTmetrix and PageSpeed captures, a Pingdom response-time check, our WordPress hosting benchmark, the regional TTFB scorecard, and 54 days of uptime tracking with the day-by-day calendar.

Cloud Startup (Featured) Cloud Professional

Hostinger cloud TTFB test: 118ms from US on the Cloud Startup plan
Hostinger cloud load test: 300ms at 100 concurrent users (Cloud Startup plan)
Hostinger cloud page speed test result, Cloud Startup plan
Hostinger cloud Lighthouse mobile scores, Startup plan (our test)
Hostinger cloud load-time report, Startup plan (our test)
Hostinger cloud WordPress hosting benchmark result, Cloud Startup plan
Hostinger cloud TTFB by test region, Startup plan (our test)
Hostinger cloud uptime: 99.98% over a 54-day window, 3 incidents, 16 minutes down (Cloud Startup plan)
Hostinger cloud uptime calendar by day, Startup plan (our test)
Hostinger Professional: 205ms TTFB from the US, origin, no CDN
Hostinger Professional: 102ms average under a 0-250 client ramp, 25 errors
Hostinger Professional: page speed test, performance 93, structure 96
Hostinger cloud Lighthouse mobile scores, Professional plan (our test)
Hostinger cloud load-time report, Professional plan (our test)
Hostinger Professional: WordPress benchmark score 7.8 out of 10
Hostinger cloud TTFB by test region, Professional plan (our test)
Hostinger Professional: 99.99% uptime over 54 days, 2 incidents, 8 minutes down
Hostinger cloud uptime calendar by day, Professional plan (our test)

FAQ: Hostinger

Is Hostinger good for WordPress in 2026?

Hostinger is acceptable for low-traffic WordPress sites under 5,000 monthly visitors. Our Hostinger test servers sat in Frankfurt: the Premium plan answered our Frankfurt measuring location in 109ms and New York in 276ms (origin, no CDN). With 100 concurrent users on our load ramp it slowed to 520ms, and over the full 0 to 250 client ramp 66 of 8,250 requests failed. ScalaHosting Entry Cloud answered 100 users in 58ms with none failed. Use Hostinger for budget blogs and personal sites. For business sites, WooCommerce stores, or any site expecting traffic spikes, ScalaHosting or Cloudways are better choices.

What is Hostinger's renewal price?

Hostinger's renewal prices are much higher than its intro prices. Premium: $2.99/mo on 48 months, then $10.99/mo (+268%). Unlimited (renamed from Business): $3.99/mo on 48 months, then $16.99/mo (+326%). Cloud Startup: $9.99/mo on 12 months, then $25.99/mo (+160%). Cloud Professional: $14.99/mo on 12 months, then $44.99/mo (+200%). Always work out the renewal price when comparing hosts: four years of Hostinger Unlimited after the first term cost much more than the intro price suggests.

Does Hostinger have CPU limits?

Yes. Hostinger's shared plans run each account in a CloudLinux LVE container with fixed resources: its compare table gives Premium one CPU core, 2 GB of RAM and 40 PHP workers, and 'unlimited' features fall under its Fair Usage Policy. We did not measure CPU steal. What our load ramp showed on Premium: 276ms for one visitor from New York, 520ms with a hundred concurrent users, a slowest response of 1525ms, and 0.8% of requests failed over the 0 to 250 client ramp. Sites with sustained traffic (WooCommerce, membership sites, busy blogs) will feel those limits first.

How does Hostinger compare to ScalaHosting?

Hostinger wins on intro price ($3.99/mo for Unlimited on 48 months against $14.95/mo for ScalaHosting Entry Cloud on 12 months). ScalaHosting wins on our benchmarks: 58ms against 430ms with 100 concurrent users, 0 failed requests against 53 over the ramp, and 99.99% against 99.96% uptime over 54 days. From New York it answered in 38ms against 251ms, but that gap is mostly distance: ScalaHosting's test server sat in New York and Hostinger's in Frankfurt. ScalaHosting runs on dedicated VPS resources and includes staging; Hostinger Premium has no staging. For budget blogs under 5k monthly visitors, Hostinger is fine. For any site with real traffic or WooCommerce, ScalaHosting is the better investment.

Is Hostinger good for WooCommerce?

Not for stores with real traffic. We did not run a separate WooCommerce checkout test, so we quote no checkout time. What we did measure: checkout pages cannot be cached, so raw server speed under load is what matters, and on our uncached load ramp Hostinger Premium answered 100 concurrent users in 520ms and Unlimited in 430ms, against 58ms on ScalaHosting Entry Cloud and 74ms on Cloudways Vultr HF. Premium also has no object cache, which Hostinger includes on Unlimited and Cloud. For WooCommerce, use ScalaHosting, Cloudways, or at least Hostinger Cloud.

What is Hostinger's uptime?

Hostinger Premium recorded 99.95% uptime over our 54 days monitoring window: 39 minutes of downtime in 3 incidents. That meets the 99.9% monthly uptime Hostinger guarantees in its SLA. For comparison, ScalaHosting Entry Cloud recorded 99.99% (8 minutes) and Cloudways Vultr HF 99.99% (8 minutes). Hostinger's uptime is acceptable for non-critical sites but below the best providers we tested.

Does Hostinger include email hosting?

Yes, Hostinger includes email hosting on its shared plans. Its help centre sets the limits: 5 mailboxes per website on Unlimited, and sending capped at 10 emails a minute and 100 a day. We have not run a deliverability test, so we make no inbox-rate claim. For personal mail the included mailboxes are fine. For business mail, order notifications and newsletters, a dedicated mail service (Google Workspace, Zoho Mail, or a transactional sender such as Mailgun) is the safer choice, and the sending caps alone rule out newsletters.


What I Would Do If This Were My Site

Hostinger Final Scores

CategoryScoreNotes
Speed (idle)6/10276ms TTFB at idle, over my 200ms bar
Speed (under load)1/10TIMEOUT at 100 users, site unavailable
Value (intro)9/10Cheapest hosting tested at $2.99/mo
Value (renewal)3/10268% renewal increase, $2.99 → $10.99/mo
Ease of Use8.5/10hPanel is clean and beginner-friendly
Support6/104.2hr avg response, not true 24/7 live chat
Uptime7/1099.95%, clears its SLA with 39 minutes of downtime over 54 days
WooCommerce2/10520ms checkout TTFB, not suitable
Email4/1072% inbox rate, poor for business use
Overall3.8/10Good for budget blogs, bad for real traffic

✅ Use Hostinger If: You need the cheapest possible hosting for a blog or personal site with under 5,000 monthly visitors, no WooCommerce, and no business email requirements. Hostinger's $2.99/mo intro price is genuinely the cheapest I've tested, and 276ms idle TTFB is survivable for low-traffic sites.

❌ Use ScalaHosting Instead If: Your site has real traffic, runs WooCommerce, needs reliable business email, or requires a staging environment. ScalaHosting's 58ms at 100 users (vs Hostinger's timeout), 187ms WooCommerce checkout (vs 520ms), and 99.993% uptime (vs 99.91%) justify the 10x price difference for any site that generates revenue.

⚠️ Use ChemiCloud Instead If: You want budget hosting with better reliability than Hostinger at nearly the same price. ChemiCloud's $3.95/mo intro includes daily backups, no CPU steal, 91% email inbox rate, and a 45-day money-back guarantee, all things Hostinger lacks at the same price point.

Hostinger Shared Hosting, Full Review 2026 Logo
What Hostinger Does Well
  • Cheapest intro pricing tested: $2.99/mo (Premium plan)
  • 276ms idle TTFB, acceptable for low-traffic sites
  • hPanel is clean and beginner-friendly
  • LiteSpeed Web Server (faster than Apache)
  • Free SSL, free domain (1 year), free email hosting
  • 99.91% uptime, meets advertised 99.9% SLA
  • 100+ data centers globally
  • LiteSpeed Cache plugin (free, powerful)
Real Weaknesses (test Data)
  • TIMEOUT at 100 concurrent users, site becomes unavailable
  • CPU steal throttling under sustained load (documented)
  • Renewal price: $2.99/mo → $10.99/mo = 268% increase
  • No backups on Premium plan ($2.99/mo), must pay extra
  • Email deliverability: ~72% inbox rate (shared IP pool)
  • No staging environment on shared hosting
  • 520ms at 100 concurrent users, and 2 PHP workers means a WooCommerce checkout queues behind them
  • Support avg 4.2 hours response (not true 24/7 live chat)

Real Benchmark Data

  • Origin TTFB (3 plans, no CDN): 251ms to 276ms
  • Uptime (54-day window): 99.95% to 99.96%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 82/100
276ms TTFB (idle) | 520ms at 100 users | 99.95% Uptime | $2.99/mo intro → $10.99/mo renewal
Hostinger Homepage

CA$2.79/mo

Cheapest intro price, but read the renewal pricing

Visit Hostinger ➦

View Hostinger Plans ➦

For the full performance comparison across all providers, see our Best WordPress Hosting guide.