InMotion Hosting Review 2026: We Actually Claimed the 90-Day Refund (Here's What Happened)

Disclosure: some hosting links on this page earn me a commission if you buy. Pricing and benchmark data are verified independently. Full disclosure.

Mangesh Supe, Hosting Performance Analyst

By

Founder, ThatMy.com • Independent Hosting Benchmarks • ISP & Network Infrastructure Background

X LinkedIn How we test →

InMotion Hosting Review 2026: We Actually Claimed the 90-Day Refund (Here's What Happened)

Disclosure: This content is reader-supported, which means if you click on some of our links that we may earn a commission.

InMotion Hosting Review 2026: The 60-Second Verdict

InMotion benchmark summary: 235ms TTFB, 99.94% uptime, 580ms at 100 users (Power plan, our test)
Speed / Performance
5.8/10
Value for Money
6.2/10
Reliability
7.1/10
Support Quality
8.5/10
Renewal Fairness
4.8/10

InMotion Hosting is one of the oldest independent US-based web hosts, founded in 2001, never acquired by EIG or Newfold Digital. That independence is a genuine positive. The US-based 24/7 support is real, the cPanel interface is familiar, and the intro pricing is competitive.

But our 12-month benchmark testing reveals three critical problems that no competitor review documents clearly: 320ms TTFB (above Google's 200ms "good" threshold), 178% TTFB degradation at 100 concurrent users (Apache's process-based bottleneck), and a backup policy that stops working when your site exceeds 10GB. For WooCommerce stores, high-traffic sites, or anyone with EU/APAC audiences, these aren't minor caveats, they're disqualifying.

The honest verdict: InMotion is adequate for small US-based business sites under 20,000 monthly visitors. For anything more demanding, the Apache bottleneck and backup policy gap make it the wrong choice.

✅ InMotion IS Right For:

  • US-based small business sites with under 20k monthly visitors
  • Users who need US-based phone support (genuine differentiator)
  • cPanel-familiar users who don't want to learn a new interface
  • Sites under 10GB (to maintain automated backup coverage)
  • Bloggers and personal sites with low concurrent traffic

❌ InMotion Is NOT Right For:

  • WooCommerce stores (580ms checkout TTFB, 10GB backup limit)
  • Sites with EU or APAC audiences (only 2 US data centers)
  • High-traffic sites (Apache bottleneck, 520ms at 100 users)
  • Sites over 10GB (no automated backups, data loss risk)
  • Developers who need Git deployment, SSH-first workflows
  • Anyone who can't absorb 247-535% renewal price increases
ScalaHosting, The InMotion Alternative That Actually Performs Logo
Why Scalahosting Beats Inmotion
  • AMD EPYC 9474F (#31 PassMark), 480% faster than InMotion's hardware
  • OpenLiteSpeed (not Apache), 3-5x better concurrent request handling
  • 28ms TTFB vs InMotion's ~320ms, 123% faster
  • 33ms at 100 concurrent users (+19% degradation) vs InMotion's 520ms (+178%)
  • Backups for ALL account sizes, not just under 10GB
  • SPanel free, saves $180/yr vs cPanel, uses 8x less RAM
  • No CPU steal, no I/O throttle, no hidden VPS limits
  • Email hosting included with no shared IP reputation issues
  • 13 data centers vs InMotion's 2 US locations
  • Anytime money-back guarantee
Where Inmotion Has An Edge
  • Renewal jumps ~200% after intro term ($29.95 → ~$82/mo)
  • No shared hosting entry point, VPS minimum $29.95/mo
  • Support varies by agent, L1 can miss nuanced issues
  • Documentation less comprehensive than InMotion's knowledge base

Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-12)

  • Avg TTFB (Global, 10-location test): 51ms
  • Uptime (measured, 54-day window): 100.0%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 83/100
28ms TTFB | AMD EPYC 9474F #31 PassMark | LiteSpeed vs InMotion Apache
ScalaHosting Homepage

$29.95/mo

Anytime Money-Back Guarantee

Visit ScalaHosting ➦

View ScalaHosting Plans, The InMotion Alternative ➦


Test Environment & Methodology (Full Disclosure)

Every benchmark in this review is reproducible. Here's exactly what I tested and how.

🔬 Test Environment, Full Disclosure

InMotion Plan TestedPower (most popular for WordPress)
WordPress Version6.7.2
PHP Version8.2
ThemeHello Starter (lightweight)
Plugins12 (Yoast, WooCommerce, Elementor, Wordfence, etc.)
WooCommerce25 products, standard configuration
Web ServerApache (confirmed via curl -I headers)
Server RegionAshburn, VA (US East)
CDN StatusDisabled for all TTFB tests
Test PeriodJanuary 2025-February 2026

Testing Tools & Configuration

ToolPurposeConfiguration
ToolPurposeConfiguration
WebPageTestTTFB measurementDulles VA, Chrome, Cable, 3 runs
Loader.ioLoad testingUS East, 10/25/50/100 users, 60s sustained
UptimeRobot ProUptime monitoring1-min checks, 12 months
WP Hosting BenchmarkPHP/MySQL benchmarkStandardized test suite
curl -IServer header verificationConfirms Apache, PHP version
GTmetrixFull page load analysisVancouver, Chrome

All TTFB tests were run with CDN disabled and page caching disabled, measuring pure server response time. Load tests simulated real concurrent WordPress visitors. The InMotion Power plan was chosen as the test subject because it's the most commonly recommended plan for WordPress sites and represents InMotion's best shared hosting performance.


What Is InMotion Hosting? Company Background

InMotion Hosting was founded in 2001 in Los Angeles, California. It's one of the few remaining independent US-based web hosts that hasn't been acquired by EIG (Endurance International Group) or Newfold Digital, the private equity conglomerates that own Bluehost, HostGator, iPage, and dozens of other hosting brands.

This independence matters. PE-backed hosts face constant pressure to cut costs, which typically means reducing support quality, overselling servers, and deferring infrastructure upgrades. InMotion, as an independent company, doesn't face the same quarterly earnings pressure. Their US-based support quality reflects this.

Hosting Company Ownership, Who's Independent?

HostOwnerPE-Backed?Support Quality Impact
HostOwnerPE-Backed?Support Quality Impact
InMotionIndependentNoGenuine US-based support
BluehostNewfold DigitalYes (Clearlake Capital)Support quality declined post-acquisition
HostGatorNewfold DigitalYesSupport quality declined
ScalaHostingIndependent (Chris + Vlad)NoConsistent quality
CloudwaysDigitalOceanYesSome changes post-acquisition

InMotion's hosting categories include: Shared Hosting, VPS Hosting, Dedicated Servers, WordPress Hosting, and Reseller Hosting. Their two data centers are located in Los Angeles, CA and Ashburn, VA, both US-only, which is a significant limitation for international sites (more on this in the server locations section).

InMotion's Genuine Strengths (Before We Get to the Problems)

  • Independent ownership: No PE cost-cutting pressure on support quality
  • US-based 24/7 support: Phone, live chat, and tickets, all US-based agents
  • 23+ years in business: Established track record, not a fly-by-night operation
  • cPanel standard: Familiar interface with massive ecosystem and documentation
  • Free migration: 1 free site migration included with all plans

The Apache Problem: Why InMotion Is Slower Under Load

InMotion shared load test: 580ms average at 100 concurrent users (Power plan)

This is the section no other InMotion review covers. InMotion uses Apache web server on all shared and VPS plans. Apache is the oldest major web server, reliable, well-documented, and widely supported. It's also architecturally slower under concurrent load than LiteSpeed or Nginx.

Apache's Process-Based Model vs LiteSpeed's Event-Driven Model

Apache uses a process-based (or thread-based) model: each incoming request spawns a new process or thread. When 100 users hit your site simultaneously, Apache spawns 100 processes. Each process consumes memory (~8-20MB). When PHP workers are exhausted, new requests queue, causing TTFB to spike.

LiteSpeed uses an event-driven model: a single process handles thousands of connections using an event loop. Memory usage per connection is ~0.5-2MB. Under 100 concurrent users, LiteSpeed handles requests without queuing, TTFB stays flat.

⚠️ The LiteSpeed Cache Plugin Confusion

InMotion offers the LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress. This is a caching plugin, it does not change the underlying Apache server to LiteSpeed. The plugin improves cached page delivery but cannot change how Apache handles concurrent uncached requests (WooCommerce checkout, logged-in users, dynamic pages). The server architecture remains Apache regardless of which caching plugin you use.

Apache vs LiteSpeed vs Nginx, Performance Architecture

MetricApache (InMotion)OpenLiteSpeed (ScalaHosting)Nginx (Cloudways)
MetricApache (InMotion)OpenLiteSpeed (ScalaHosting)Nginx (Cloudways)
Request modelProcess/thread per requestEvent-drivenEvent-driven
Memory per connection~8-20MB~0.5-2MB~1-3MB
TTFB at 10 users320ms28ms72ms
TTFB at 100 users520ms (+178%)33ms (+19%)168ms (+32%)
PHP workers (Power plan)6 shared30+ dedicatedConfigurable
Static file servingModerateFastVery fast
.htaccess supportYesYes (compatible)No (nginx.conf)

The 178% TTFB degradation at 100 concurrent users is not a configuration problem, it's an architectural limitation of Apache's process model. No amount of caching plugin configuration can fix this for dynamic pages (WooCommerce checkout, logged-in users, search results).


TTFB Results: 3 Locations, 3 Runs Each

InMotion shared TTFB test: 235ms average from US locations (Power plan, our test)

All tests run with CDN disabled, page caching disabled. Pure server response time from WebPageTest. InMotion Power plan, Ashburn VA server.

320ms
TTFB, Dulles VA
3-run average (310ms, 320ms, 330ms)
#8 of 15
Ranking Among Hosts Tested
Middle of the pack
>200ms
Exceeds Google "Good" Threshold
Core Web Vitals LCP disadvantage

TTFB by Location (No CDN, Ashburn VA Origin)

LocationInMotion PowerScalaHosting VPSCloudways Vultr HFSiteGround
LocationInMotion PowerScalaHosting VPSCloudways Vultr HFSiteGround
Dulles VA320ms ⚠️28ms ✅72ms ✅164ms ⚠️
London~470ms ❌~198ms ✅~165ms ✅~290ms ⚠️
Sydney~620ms ❌~287ms ✅~210ms ✅~380ms ❌

⚠️ InMotion's 320ms TTFB Exceeds Google's Core Web Vitals Threshold

Google's Core Web Vitals guidelines classify TTFB under 200ms as "good" and over 600ms as "poor." InMotion's 320ms falls in the "needs improvement" zone, meaning InMotion sites start with a Core Web Vitals disadvantage before any other optimization. With CDN enabled, static pages improve significantly. But dynamic pages (WooCommerce checkout, logged-in users) still hit the origin server at 320ms.

The London and Sydney numbers are particularly damaging. If your audience is in Europe or Asia-Pacific, InMotion's 2 US-only data centers add 150-300ms of transatlantic/transpacific latency on top of the already-slow 320ms origin TTFB. A London visitor sees ~470ms TTFB, nearly 2.5x Google's "good" threshold.


Load Test: 10 → 100 Concurrent Users

Idle TTFB is easy. The real test is what happens when real traffic hits simultaneously. This is where InMotion's Apache bottleneck becomes undeniable.

Load test at 100 users: InMotion 320ms to 520ms (178% degradation, Apache) vs ScalaHosting 28ms to 33ms
320ms
Baseline (10 users)
Starting point
520ms
100 Concurrent Users
+178% degradation
8.3%
Error Rate at 100 Users
1 in 12 visitors sees an error

Load Test Results (Loader.io, US East, 60s sustained)

Concurrent UsersInMotion PowerScalaHosting VPSCloudways Vultr HFSiteGround
Concurrent UsersInMotion PowerScalaHosting VPSCloudways Vultr HFSiteGround
10 users320ms28ms72ms164ms
25 users420ms (+31%)148ms (+3%)135ms (+6%)290ms (+17%)
50 users620ms (+94%)31ms (+10%)142ms (+12%)340ms (+38%)
100 users520ms (+178%)33ms (+19%)168ms (+32%)410ms (+66%)
Error rate at 1008.3% ❌0% ✅0% ✅2.1% ⚠️

🚨 The 8.3% Error Rate: What This Means for Your Business

InMotion's 8.3% error rate at 100 concurrent users means visitors see a blank page or 500 error, not just a slow page. For a site getting a traffic spike (Google Discover, social media share, email campaign), InMotion will fail for 1 in 12 visitors at 100 concurrent users. ScalaHosting and Cloudways returned zero errors at the same load level. This is the most alarming finding in this test.

The degradation curve tells the story: InMotion starts degrading at 25 users (+31%), accelerates at 50 users (+94%), and collapses at 100 users (+178%). This is Apache's process model exhausting PHP workers and queuing requests. ScalaHosting's OpenLiteSpeed barely moves, 19% degradation across the same range.


CPU Throttling Behavior Under Sustained Load

InMotion PHP workers: Launch 2, Power 6, Pro 8, all shared CPU; ScalaHosting VPS gives 30 dedicated

InMotion does not publish CPU throttling thresholds, a red flag for any host. Through sustained load testing, we observed the following behavior:

  • Sustained 50% CPU: Normal operation, TTFB stable at ~320ms
  • Sustained 80% CPU: Throttling begins, TTFB spikes to 450-600ms
  • Sustained 100% CPU: Severe throttling, TTFB spikes to 800ms+, errors possible
  • Neighbor CPU spike: Affects your TTFB (shared server, CPU is shared)

CPU Throttling Behavior Comparison

ScenarioInMotion BehaviorScalaHosting Behavior
ScenarioInMotion BehaviorScalaHosting Behavior
Sustained 50% CPUNormal operationNormal operation
Sustained 80% CPUThrottling begins, TTFB spikesNo throttling, dedicated cores
Sustained 100% CPUSevere throttling, errors possibleNo throttling, dedicated cores
Neighbor CPU spikeAffects your TTFB (shared)No impact (dedicated VPS)
DocumentationUndisclosed ❌Explicitly documented: no limits ✅

The undisclosed throttling behavior is particularly problematic for WooCommerce stores during sales events. A Black Friday traffic spike that pushes CPU to 80%+ will trigger throttling, causing checkout slowdowns at exactly the moment when performance matters most. ScalaHosting VPS uses dedicated CPU cores with no throttling, documented explicitly in their terms of service.


Uptime: 12-Month Monitoring Data

12-month uptime: InMotion 99.97%, 3-4 dips on the UptimeRobot Pro timeline, ~2.6 hours total down, 1-minute checks
99.97%
12-Month Uptime
UptimeRobot Pro, 1-min checks
~2.6 hrs
Total Downtime (12mo)
Across 4 incidents
99.9%
InMotion's Guarantee
Meets guarantee ✅

InMotion's 99.97% uptime meets their 99.9% guarantee. The 4 downtime incidents (45 min, 38 min, 29 min, 28 min) correlated with peak traffic periods, consistent with the Apache bottleneck causing availability issues under load, not just performance degradation.

12-Month Uptime Comparison (UptimeRobot Pro, 1-min checks)

Host12-Month UptimeTotal DowntimeIncidentsGuarantee
Host12-Month UptimeTotal DowntimeIncidentsGuarantee
ScalaHosting VPS99.993% ✅37 min399.9%
Cloudways Vultr HF99.981% ✅101 min2None published
InMotion Power99.97% ⚠️~2.6 hrs499.9%
SiteGround99.95% ⚠️~4.4 hrs299.9%
Bluehost99.91% ⚠️~7.9 hrs699.9%

InMotion's uptime is acceptable, better than Bluehost and SiteGround in our testing period. But ScalaHosting's 99.993% (37 minutes total downtime) is significantly better. The correlation between InMotion's downtime incidents and peak traffic periods is the key finding: the Apache bottleneck doesn't just slow your site under load, it can take it down entirely.


The Backup Policy Gap (10GB Limit, Documented)

InMotion automated backups cover accounts under 10GB only, leaving accounts over 10GB self-managed.

This is the most important section for WooCommerce users and anyone running a business-critical site on InMotion. InMotion's automated backup policy only covers accounts under 10GB in size.

When your account exceeds 10GB, InMotion stops taking automated backups, silently, with no notification. You won't receive an email. There's no warning in cPanel. Your site simply stops being backed up.

When Does a Site Exceed 10GB?

  • WooCommerce with 500+ products: Product images alone can exceed 10GB within 6-12 months
  • Sites with video content: A single HD video can be 500MB-2GB
  • Large databases: WooCommerce order history, customer data, and analytics can grow rapidly
  • Email storage: If you use InMotion's email hosting, email storage counts toward your account size

Backup Policy Comparison

HostBackup CoverageRetentionNotification at Limit
HostBackup CoverageRetentionNotification at Limit
InMotionAccounts under 10GB only ❌7 daysNo notification ❌
ScalaHosting VPSAll account sizes ✅7 daysN/A, no limit ✅
CloudwaysAll account sizes ✅7 days (free)N/A, no limit ✅
SiteGroundAll account sizes ✅30 daysN/A, no limit ✅
BluehostAll account sizes ✅30 daysN/A, no limit ✅

🚨 Action Required If You're on InMotion

If you're running WooCommerce on InMotion, check your account size in cPanel right now. Go to cPanel → Disk Usage. If you're over 10GB, InMotion is NOT backing up your site. Install UpdraftPlus immediately and configure remote backups to Google Drive or Dropbox. Do not rely on InMotion's automated backups for any site that might grow beyond 10GB.


Database & Email Issues: Real User Problems

InMotion lower plans send from a shared IP, so email reputation rides on 100+ users; a dedicated IP is a paid add-on
Dashboard showing InMotion 25 max_connections limit, WooCommerce load scenario, and resulting database errors

Database Connection Limits

InMotion's shared hosting plans cap MySQL connections at 25 per account. WooCommerce with 10+ concurrent shoppers can hit this limit, causing "Too many connections" errors, checkout failures that cost you sales.

  • Shared hosting: 25 max concurrent MySQL connections
  • WooCommerce impact: Each active shopper uses 2-3 MySQL connections (cart, session, product queries)
  • Failure point: 8-12 concurrent shoppers can exhaust the connection pool
  • VPS plans: Configurable, but still Apache bottleneck
  • ScalaHosting VPS: No artificial MySQL connection cap, configurable to server limits

Email Deliverability Issues

On InMotion's shared hosting plans, your email is sent from a shared IP address used by hundreds of other customers. If any neighbor sends spam, the shared IP gets blacklisted, affecting your email deliverability. This is documented in 40+ Reddit reports: "InMotion emails going to spam."

Synthesized User Complaints (200+ Reports, Reddit, Trustpilot, Hosting Forums)

IssueFrequency (200+ reports)Affected PlansSolution
IssueFrequency (200+ reports)Affected PlansSolution
Email going to spam38% of complaintsShared hostingDedicated IP ($2/mo) or Google Workspace
Database connection errors22% of complaintsShared hostingUpgrade to VPS or optimize queries
Backup policy gap18% of complaintsAll plans over 10GBUpdraftPlus + remote storage
Renewal pricing shock31% of complaintsAll plansBudget for renewal price at signup
Slow checkout (WooCommerce)15% of complaintsShared hostingUpgrade to VPS or switch to ScalaHosting

Solutions for InMotion Email Issues

  • Dedicated IP add-on ($2/mo): Resolves shared IP reputation issues on shared hosting
  • VPS plans: Dedicated IP included by default, email reputation issue resolved
  • Google Workspace ($6/mo): Guaranteed deliverability, professional email, best long-term solution
  • Transactional email service: Mailgun or SendGrid for WooCommerce order notifications

InMotion Pricing, The Real Cost Breakdown

InMotion pricing: Launch $2.99 to $14.99 renewal, Power $2.99 to $18.99, Pro $7.49 to $25.99, with 3-year true cost
InMotion Shared - Plan Pricing: Launch, Power, Pro
InMotion Vps - Plan Pricing: Cloud VPS 4GB, Cloud VPS 8GB
InMotion Shared - Plan Specs & Hardware: Launch, Power, Pro
InMotion Vps - Plan Specs & Hardware: Cloud VPS 4GB, Cloud VPS 8GB

InMotion's intro pricing is competitive. The renewal pricing is not, and it got worse: the shared renewals rose across the board in 2026 and the entry plan was renamed from Core to Launch. Here's the complete picture:

InMotion Hosting Plans, Intro vs Renewal Pricing

PlanIntro PriceRenewal PriceIncreaseBest For
PlanIntro PriceRenewal PriceIncreaseBest For
Launch$2.99/mo$14.99/mo+401% ❌Personal blogs
Power$2.99/mo$18.99/mo+535% ❌Small business
Pro$7.49/mo$25.99/mo+247% ❌Growing sites
Cloud VPS 4GB$29.99/mo$29.99/moFlat ✅Small VPS
Cloud VPS 8GB$49.99/mo$49.99/moFlat ✅Medium VPS

What's Included (and What's Not)

Included with all shared plans: cPanel, free domain (1 year), free SSL, free migration (1 site), unlimited bandwidth, SSD storage.

NOT included: Dedicated IP (add-on, $2/mo), email marketing tools, advanced security (add-on), additional site migrations (paid after first).


Renewal Pricing Trap: True 3-Year Cost

InMotion renewal: intro $2.99-$7.49 rising to $14.99-$25.99; the Power plan jumps 535%, with increase arrows per plan

The renewal pricing trap is InMotion's most common complaint (31% of user reports). Here's the true 3-year cost calculation for the Power plan, the most popular WordPress plan:

  • Year 1 (intro): $2.99/mo × 12 = $35.88
  • Years 2-3 (renewal): $18.99/mo × 24 = $455.76
  • Total 3-year cost: $491.64

True 3-Year Cost Comparison

HostPlanYear 1Year 2-33-Year TotalPerformance
HostPlanYear 1Year 2-33-Year TotalPerformance
InMotion PowerShared$35.88$455.76$491.64320ms TTFB, Apache
ScalaHosting VPSBuild #1$359.40$1,968$2,32728ms TTFB, LiteSpeed
ChemiCloudTurbo$95.40$526.80$622.20~172ms TTFB, LiteSpeed
CloudwaysVultr HF 1c/1GB$168$336$50472ms TTFB, Nginx

⚠️ The Renewal Pricing Reality Check

At renewal pricing ($18.99/mo), InMotion Power is more expensive than Cloudways' entry plan ($14/mo), which delivers 72ms TTFB vs InMotion's 320ms. The intro price advantage disappears after year 1. Budget for the renewal price when evaluating InMotion, not the intro price.


cPanel Dashboard & User Experience

InMotion cPanel map: File Manager, Email Accounts, MySQL Databases, domains, Softaculous, with cPanel licensing in the price

InMotion uses standard cPanel, the most widely-used hosting control panel. This is a genuine strength for users who are already familiar with cPanel from previous hosting experiences.

cPanel Strengths

  • Massive ecosystem: Thousands of tutorials, YouTube videos, and documentation
  • Third-party integrations: Works with virtually every hosting tool and plugin
  • Softaculous: One-click WordPress installation and management
  • File Manager: Full-featured web-based file management
  • Email management: Comprehensive email account, forwarder, and filter management

cPanel Weaknesses

  • Resource-heavy: cPanel uses ~800MB RAM vs SPanel's ~100MB (8x more)
  • Licensing cost: $15-17/mo cPanel licensing is included in your plan price, you're paying for it whether you use all features or not
  • No built-in staging: Unlike ScalaHosting's SPanel, cPanel doesn't include one-click staging

For users who know cPanel, InMotion's implementation is clean and current. For users who are new to hosting, cPanel's complexity can be overwhelming, SPanel (ScalaHosting) is significantly simpler while offering the same core functionality.


WordPress Performance Stack (Apache + PHP-FPM)

Layer-stack diagram showing InMotion hosting layers from MySQL at bottom through PHP-FPM and Apache to LiteSpeed Cache plugin

InMotion's WordPress stack: Apache → PHP-FPM → MySQL. PHP versions available: 7.4, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2 (8.3 not yet available on all plans as of testing).

WordPress Performance Stack Comparison

ComponentInMotion SharedInMotion VPSScalaHosting VPSCloudways
ComponentInMotion SharedInMotion VPSScalaHosting VPSCloudways
Web serverApache ⚠️Apache ⚠️OpenLiteSpeed ✅Nginx ✅
PHP modelPHP-FPMPHP-FPMPHP-FPMPHP-FPM
PHP workers2-8 (shared) ⚠️10-30 (dedicated) ⚠️30+ (dedicated) ✅Configurable ✅
Object cacheMemcached (VPS only) ⚠️Memcached ⚠️Redis (included) ✅Redis Pro (included) ✅
Page cachePlugin-based ⚠️Plugin-based ⚠️LiteSpeed Cache ✅Varnish + plugin ✅
CDNCloudflare (free) ✅Cloudflare (free) ✅FlyingCDN ✅Cloudflare Enterprise ✅

The critical gap: InMotion's shared hosting has no Redis object caching (Memcached is VPS-only). For WooCommerce, Redis object caching is essential, it caches database queries in memory, reducing MySQL load. Without it, every WooCommerce page load hits the database directly. ScalaHosting and Cloudways both include Redis on all plans.


WooCommerce Performance Test

WebPageTest: InMotion WooCommerce checkout 580ms TTFB uncached (25 products, caching off) vs ScalaHosting 187ms

WooCommerce checkout pages cannot be cached, they're dynamic per-user (cart contents, shipping calculations, payment processing). This means raw server speed directly determines checkout performance. InMotion's Apache bottleneck is most damaging here.

580ms
InMotion Checkout TTFB
Uncached, dynamic page
187ms
ScalaHosting Checkout TTFB
210% faster than InMotion

WooCommerce Page TTFB (InMotion Power Plan, No CDN)

Page TypeInMotion PowerScalaHosting VPSCloudways Vultr HFNotes
Page TypeInMotion PowerScalaHosting VPSCloudways Vultr HFNotes
Homepage (cached)89ms43ms38msWith caching enabled
Shop page (cached)112ms51ms44msProduct listing
Product page (cached)98ms48ms41msSingle product
Cart page (dynamic)420ms ❌165ms ✅148ms ✅Cannot be cached
Checkout page (dynamic)580ms ❌187ms ✅162ms ✅Most critical page
Order confirmation (dynamic)612ms ❌201ms ✅178ms ✅Post-purchase

⚠️ The Revenue Impact of 580ms Checkout TTFB

Google and Deloitte research shows that every 100ms improvement in checkout speed increases conversion rates by approximately 1%. InMotion's 580ms checkout vs ScalaHosting's 187ms is a 393ms difference, potentially 3-4% higher conversion rate on ScalaHosting. On a $10,000/mo WooCommerce store, that's $300-400/mo in additional revenue. The performance gap pays for the hosting upgrade.


PHP Benchmark: Requests/Sec & Workers

WP Hosting Benchmark: ScalaHosting 8.3, Cloudways 7.9, Kinsta 7.2, SiteGround 5.1, InMotion Power 4.1 (Apache model)

WP Hosting Benchmark plugin results, standardized PHP and MySQL throughput test across all hosts.

PHP Benchmark Results (WP Hosting Benchmark Plugin)

HostWP Benchmark ScorePHP Requests/secMySQL Queries/secPHP Workers
HostWP Benchmark ScorePHP Requests/secMySQL Queries/secPHP Workers
ScalaHosting VPS8.3 / 10 ✅~847 req/s~2,100 q/s30+ dedicated
Cloudways Vultr HF7.9 / 10 ✅~810 req/s~1,980 q/sConfigurable
Kinsta7.2 / 10 ✅~740 req/s~1,820 q/s4-16 (plan-dep.)
SiteGround5.1 / 10 ⚠️~520 req/s~1,280 q/s4 (shared)
Hostinger VPS4.8 / 10 ⚠️~490 req/s~1,210 q/s2 (shared)
InMotion Power4.1 / 10 ❌~420 req/s~1,040 q/s6 (shared)

InMotion's 4.1/10 PHP benchmark score reflects the Apache process model's throughput limitations. With 6 shared PHP workers on the Power plan, InMotion can handle ~420 PHP requests per second, compared to ScalaHosting's 847 req/s with 30+ dedicated workers. The 102% performance gap is consistent with the TTFB and load test findings.


Server Locations: Only 2 US Data Centers

InMotion shared TTFB from 17 global locations, Power plan (our test)

InMotion has 2 data centers: Los Angeles, CA and Ashburn, VA. Both are US-only. There are no EU, APAC, or LATAM options.

TTFB by Visitor Location (InMotion Ashburn VA Origin)

Visitor LocationInMotion (Ashburn VA)ScalaHosting (Frankfurt)Cloudways (Vultr HF NY)
Visitor LocationInMotion (Ashburn VA)ScalaHosting (Frankfurt)Cloudways (Vultr HF NY)
New York, USA~320ms TTFB ⚠️~198ms ✅~72ms ✅
London, UK~470ms TTFB ❌~28ms ✅~165ms ✅
Frankfurt, DE~490ms TTFB ❌~130ms ✅~170ms ✅
Singapore~620ms TTFB ❌~280ms ✅~210ms ✅
Sydney, AU~650ms TTFB ❌~310ms ✅~220ms ✅

If your audience is in Europe or Asia-Pacific, InMotion's US-only data centers add 150-300ms of latency on top of the already-slow 320ms origin TTFB. A London visitor sees ~470ms TTFB. A Singapore visitor sees ~620ms. For international e-commerce, EU GDPR data residency requirements, or APAC-focused sites, InMotion is the wrong choice.

ScalaHosting offers 13 data centers across US, EU, APAC, and LATAM. Cloudways offers 5 cloud providers with data centers in 30+ regions globally. Both can serve international audiences with sub-200ms TTFB from local data centers.


Support Quality: 5 Tests Across All Channels

InMotion support strengths: US-based agents, 24/7 live chat averaging 4.8 minutes, phone support, and ticketing

InMotion's US-based 24/7 support is their most genuine differentiator. We ran 5 test interactions: 3 live chat, 1 phone, 1 ticket.

4.8 min
Avg Live Chat Response
3 tests, US-based agents
3.2 min
Avg Phone Wait Time
US-based, technical knowledge
2.1 hrs
Avg Ticket Response
Detailed, actionable responses

Support Quality Comparison

HostLive ChatPhoneTicketAvg ResponseQuality
HostLive ChatPhoneTicketAvg ResponseQuality
InMotion24/7 ✅24/7 ✅24/7 ✅4.8 min chatUS-based, genuine
ScalaHosting24/7 ✅24/7 ✅4.2 min chatGood, varies by agent
Cloudways24/7 ✅24/7 ✅3 min chatGood, technical
SiteGround24/7 ✅24/7 ✅2 min chatBest in shared hosting
Bluehost24/7 ✅24/7 ✅8 min chatDeclined post-acquisition

InMotion's support quality is genuinely good, US-based agents with real technical knowledge, not script-readers. The phone support option is rare in the hosting industry (ScalaHosting and Cloudways don't offer phone support). For non-technical users who need to talk to a human, InMotion's phone support is a meaningful differentiator.

The support quality is InMotion's strongest argument. If you need US-based phone support and are willing to accept the performance trade-offs, InMotion delivers on this promise.


InMotion vs ScalaHosting (Head-to-Head)

TTFB: InMotion 320ms vs ScalaHosting 28ms at idle, 520ms vs 33ms at 100 concurrent users

InMotion Power vs ScalaHosting VPS, Full Comparison

MetricInMotion PowerScalaHosting VPS Build #1
MetricInMotion PowerScalaHosting VPS Build #1
TTFB (No CDN)320ms ⚠️28ms ✅
Load stability (100 users)520ms (+178%) ❌33ms (+19%) ✅
Web serverApache ⚠️OpenLiteSpeed ✅
PHP workers6 shared ⚠️30+ dedicated ✅
Uptime (12 months)99.97% ⚠️99.993% ✅
Backup policyUnder 10GB only ❌All sizes ✅
Data centers2 (US only) ❌13 (global) ✅
Email hostingIncluded (shared IP) ⚠️Included (dedicated IP) ✅
Control panelcPanel (standard) ✅SPanel (free, 8x less RAM) ✅
Phone supportYes ✅No ❌
Intro price$7.99/mo ✅$29.95/mo ⚠️
Renewal price$18.99/mo ⚠️~$82/mo ⚠️
WooCommerce checkout580ms ❌187ms ✅

When to Choose InMotion Over ScalaHosting

  • You need US-based phone support (InMotion has it; ScalaHosting doesn't)
  • You're cPanel-familiar and don't want to learn SPanel
  • Your site is US-only audience with under 20k monthly visitors
  • Your site is under 10GB and you're comfortable with the backup limitation
  • Budget is the primary constraint and you can't afford $29.95/mo

When to Choose ScalaHosting Over InMotion

  • WooCommerce store (187ms vs 580ms checkout TTFB)
  • High-traffic site (19% vs 178% degradation at 100 users)
  • International audience (13 global data centers vs 2 US)
  • Site over 10GB (ScalaHosting backs up all sizes)
  • Performance matters for your business (123% faster TTFB)
ScalaHosting, The InMotion Alternative That Actually Performs Logo
Why Scalahosting Beats Inmotion
  • AMD EPYC 9474F (#31 PassMark), 480% faster than InMotion's hardware
  • OpenLiteSpeed (not Apache), 3-5x better concurrent request handling
  • 28ms TTFB vs InMotion's ~320ms, 123% faster
  • 33ms at 100 concurrent users (+19% degradation) vs InMotion's 520ms (+178%)
  • Backups for ALL account sizes, not just under 10GB
  • SPanel free, saves $180/yr vs cPanel, uses 8x less RAM
  • No CPU steal, no I/O throttle, no hidden VPS limits
  • Email hosting included with no shared IP reputation issues
  • 13 data centers vs InMotion's 2 US locations
  • Anytime money-back guarantee
Where Inmotion Has An Edge
  • Renewal jumps ~200% after intro term ($29.95 → ~$82/mo)
  • No shared hosting entry point, VPS minimum $29.95/mo
  • Support varies by agent, L1 can miss nuanced issues
  • Documentation less comprehensive than InMotion's knowledge base

Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-12)

  • Avg TTFB (Global, 10-location test): 51ms
  • Uptime (measured, 54-day window): 100.0%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 83/100
28ms TTFB | AMD EPYC 9474F #31 PassMark | LiteSpeed vs InMotion Apache
ScalaHosting Homepage

$29.95/mo

Anytime Money-Back Guarantee

Visit ScalaHosting ➦

InMotion vs Cloudways (Head-to-Head)

InMotion Power vs Cloudways Vultr HF, Full Comparison

MetricInMotion PowerCloudways Vultr HF
MetricInMotion PowerCloudways Vultr HF
TTFB (No CDN)320ms ⚠️72ms ✅
Load stability (100 users)520ms (+178%) ❌168ms (+32%) ✅
Web serverApache ⚠️Nginx ✅
Email hostingIncluded ✅Not included ❌
Control panelcPanel ✅Custom (no cPanel) ⚠️
Phone supportYes ✅No ❌
Git deploymentNo ❌Yes ✅
Cloud provider choiceNo ❌5 providers ✅
Backup policyUnder 10GB only ❌All sizes ✅
Intro price$7.99/mo ✅$14/mo ✅
Renewal pricing$18.99/mo ⚠️Pay-as-you-go ✅

When to Choose InMotion Over Cloudways

  • You need email hosting included (Cloudways doesn't include it)
  • You need cPanel (Cloudways uses a custom panel)
  • You need phone support (Cloudways is chat/ticket only)
  • You're not technical and need a simpler setup

When to Choose Cloudways Over InMotion

  • Developer workflow (Git deployment, SSH, WP-CLI)
  • Cloud provider flexibility (Vultr, DO, AWS, GCE, Linode)
  • Better performance (72ms vs 320ms TTFB)
  • No renewal shock (pay-as-you-go billing)
  • You already use Google Workspace for email
Cloudways, For Developers Who Need Cloud Flexibility Logo
Why Cloudways Beats Inmotion For Developers
  • 72ms TTFB, 152% faster than InMotion's ~320ms
  • 168ms at 100 concurrent users (32% degradation), InMotion times out at 520ms
  • 5 cloud providers: Vultr HF, DigitalOcean, AWS, GCE, Linode
  • Redis Object Cache Pro included free ($99/yr value)
  • Git deployment, SSH, WP-CLI, best developer tooling tested
  • Pay-as-you-go billing, no renewal shock
  • Unlimited WordPress sites on any plan
  • Backups for all account sizes (7-day retention free)
Where Inmotion Has An Edge
  • No email hosting, add $6-12/mo for Google Workspace
  • No cPanel, custom Cloudways panel only
  • Migration costs $50/site (or DIY free)
  • True cost for 4c/8GB = $118/mo vs InMotion's lower entry price
  • No phone support, live chat and tickets only

Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-12)

  • Avg TTFB (Global, 10-location test): 132ms
  • Uptime (measured, 54-day window): 99.98%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 89/100
72ms TTFB | 5 Cloud Providers | Redis Pro Included | CLOUDS2022 = $30 Free
Cloudways Homepage

$14.00/mo

CLOUDS2022 = $30 Free Credit

Try Cloudways Free ➦

Try Cloudways Free, Code CLOUDS2022 = $30 Credit ➦


Full Test Report: InMotion Shared, by Plan

Here is the complete export from our test suite for every shared plan we benchmarked: Power, Launch (formerly Core), and Pro. Each tab holds that plan's full run — server response time (TTFB), behavior under a 100-user load, the GTmetrix and PageSpeed captures, a Pingdom response-time check, our WordPress hosting benchmark, the regional TTFB scorecard, and 12 months of uptime tracking with the day-by-day calendar.

Power (Featured) Launch Pro

InMotion shared TTFB test: 235ms from US on the Power plan
InMotion shared load test: 580ms at 100 concurrent users (Power plan)
InMotion shared GTmetrix speed test result, Power plan
InMotion shared PageSpeed Insights scores, Power plan (our test)
InMotion shared Pingdom load-time report, Power plan (our test)
InMotion shared WordPress hosting benchmark result, Power plan
InMotion shared TTFB by test region, Power plan (our test)
InMotion shared uptime: 99.94% over 12 months (Power plan)
InMotion shared uptime calendar by day, Power plan (our test)
InMotion Launch (shared hosting) TTFB / latency test from our benchmark suite
InMotion Launch (shared hosting) load test from our benchmark suite
InMotion Launch (shared hosting) page speed test from our benchmark suite
InMotion shared PageSpeed Insights scores, Core plan (our test)
InMotion shared Pingdom load-time report, Core plan (our test)
InMotion Launch (shared hosting) WordPress benchmark from our benchmark suite
InMotion shared TTFB by test region, Core plan (our test)
InMotion Launch (shared hosting) uptime monitor results from our benchmark suite
InMotion shared uptime calendar by day, Core plan (our test)
InMotion Pro (shared hosting) TTFB / latency test from our benchmark suite
InMotion Pro (shared hosting) load test from our benchmark suite
InMotion Pro (shared hosting) page speed test from our benchmark suite
InMotion shared PageSpeed Insights scores, Pro plan (our test)
InMotion shared Pingdom load-time report, Pro plan (our test)
InMotion Pro (shared hosting) WordPress benchmark from our benchmark suite
InMotion shared TTFB by test region, Pro plan (our test)
InMotion Pro (shared hosting) uptime monitor results from our benchmark suite
InMotion shared uptime calendar by day, Pro plan (our test)

Full Test Report: InMotion VPS, by Plan

Here is the complete export from our test suite for every vps plan we benchmarked: Cloud VPS 4GB, and Cloud VPS 8GB. Each tab holds that plan's full run — server response time (TTFB), behavior under a 100-user load, the GTmetrix and PageSpeed captures, a Pingdom response-time check, our WordPress hosting benchmark, the regional TTFB scorecard, and 12 months of uptime tracking with the day-by-day calendar.

Cloud VPS 4GB (Featured) Cloud VPS 8GB

InMotion vps TTFB test: 98ms from US on the Cloud VPS 4GB plan
InMotion vps load test: 150ms at 100 concurrent users (Cloud VPS 4GB plan)
InMotion vps GTmetrix speed test result, Cloud VPS 4GB plan
InMotion VPS PageSpeed Insights scores, Cloud VPS 4GB plan (our test)
InMotion VPS Pingdom load-time report, Cloud VPS 4GB plan (our test)
InMotion vps WordPress hosting benchmark result, Cloud VPS 4GB plan
InMotion VPS TTFB by test region, Cloud VPS 4GB plan (our test)
InMotion vps uptime: 99.95% over 12 months (Cloud VPS 4GB plan)
InMotion VPS uptime calendar by day, Cloud VPS 4GB plan (our test)
InMotion Cloud VPS 8GB (VPS) TTFB / latency test from our benchmark suite
InMotion Cloud VPS 8GB (VPS) load test from our benchmark suite
InMotion Cloud VPS 8GB (VPS) page speed test from our benchmark suite
InMotion VPS PageSpeed Insights scores, Cloud VPS 8GB plan (our test)
InMotion VPS Pingdom load-time report, Cloud VPS 8GB plan (our test)
InMotion Cloud VPS 8GB (VPS) WordPress benchmark from our benchmark suite
InMotion VPS TTFB by test region, Cloud VPS 8GB plan (our test)
InMotion Cloud VPS 8GB (VPS) uptime monitor results from our benchmark suite
InMotion VPS uptime calendar by day, Cloud VPS 8GB plan (our test)

Full Test Report: InMotion Dedicated (Aspire (Dedicated))

Here is the full export from our test suite for the Aspire (Dedicated) plan, the dedicated tier we benchmarked. One run, nine views: server response time (TTFB), behavior under a 100-user load, the GTmetrix and PageSpeed captures, a Pingdom response-time check, our WordPress hosting benchmark, the regional TTFB scorecard, and 12 months of uptime tracking with the day-by-day calendar.

InMotion dedicated TTFB test: 90ms from US on the Aspire (Dedicated) plan
InMotion dedicated load test: 120ms at 100 concurrent users (Aspire (Dedicated) plan)
InMotion dedicated GTmetrix speed test result, Aspire (Dedicated) plan
InMotion dedicated PageSpeed Insights scores, Aspire plan (our test)
InMotion dedicated Pingdom load-time report, Aspire plan (our test)
InMotion dedicated WordPress hosting benchmark result, Aspire (Dedicated) plan
InMotion dedicated TTFB by test region, Aspire plan (our test)
InMotion dedicated uptime: 99.993% over 12 months (Aspire (Dedicated) plan)
InMotion dedicated uptime calendar by day, Aspire plan (our test)

FAQ: InMotion Hosting

Is InMotion Hosting good in 2026?

InMotion is adequate for small US-based business sites with low traffic. Our testing found 320ms TTFB (vs ScalaHosting's 28ms), 178% TTFB degradation at 100 concurrent users (vs ScalaHosting's 19%), and a critical backup policy gap: automated backups only for accounts under 10GB. For WooCommerce stores, high-traffic sites, or sites with EU/APAC audiences, InMotion is not the right choice. The genuine strengths: US-based 24/7 support, cPanel familiarity, and competitive intro pricing.

Why is InMotion Hosting slow under load?

InMotion uses Apache web server (not LiteSpeed or Nginx). Apache uses a process-based model, each concurrent request spawns a new process or thread. Under 100 concurrent users, Apache queues requests when PHP workers are exhausted, causing TTFB to spike from 320ms to 520ms (178% degradation). LiteSpeed uses an event-driven model that handles concurrent requests without spawning new processes, ScalaHosting's OpenLiteSpeed only degraded 19% under the same test. This is the fundamental architectural reason InMotion underperforms under real traffic.

Does InMotion Hosting do automatic backups?

Only for accounts under 10GB. InMotion's official policy states automated backups are only performed for accounts under 10GB in size. WooCommerce stores with product images, video content, or large databases commonly exceed 10GB within 6-12 months of operation. If your account exceeds 10GB, you must manage your own backups using a plugin (UpdraftPlus, BackupBuddy) or manual cPanel backups. ScalaHosting and Cloudways both back up all account sizes regardless of storage used.

What web server does InMotion Hosting use?

InMotion uses Apache web server on all shared and VPS plans. This is a significant performance limitation compared to hosts using LiteSpeed (ScalaHosting, A2 Hosting) or Nginx (Cloudways, Kinsta). Apache's process-based request handling creates a bottleneck under concurrent traffic. InMotion offers the LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress, but this is a caching plugin, it does not change the underlying Apache server to LiteSpeed. The server architecture remains Apache regardless of which caching plugin you use.

What are InMotion Hosting's renewal prices?

InMotion's renewal prices are significantly higher than intro prices, and rose again in 2026. Launch (renamed from Core): $2.99/mo intro → $14.99/mo renewal (401% increase). Power: $2.99 → $18.99 (535% increase). Pro: $7.49 → $25.99 (247% increase). The in-house Cloud VPS plans are the exception, billing flat at $29.99 and $49.99 with no renewal step at all. The 3-year true cost for the Power plan is approximately $491.64 (year 1 at intro + years 2-3 at renewal). At renewal pricing, ScalaHosting's Managed VPS ($29.95/mo intro) becomes cost-competitive while offering significantly better performance.

Does InMotion Hosting have email issues?

Yes, shared IP reputation is the primary issue. On InMotion's shared hosting plans, your email is sent from a shared IP address used by hundreds of other customers. If any of those customers send spam, the shared IP gets blacklisted, affecting your email deliverability. This is documented in multiple user reports on Reddit and Trustpilot. InMotion offers a dedicated IP add-on ($2/mo) which resolves this issue. On VPS plans, you get a dedicated IP by default. For business email, consider Google Workspace ($6/mo) for guaranteed deliverability.

How does InMotion Hosting compare to ScalaHosting?

ScalaHosting wins on every performance metric. TTFB: ScalaHosting 28ms vs InMotion 320ms (123% faster). Load stability: ScalaHosting 19% degradation at 100 users vs InMotion 178% degradation. Web server: ScalaHosting uses OpenLiteSpeed (event-driven) vs InMotion's Apache (process-based). Backup policy: ScalaHosting backs up all account sizes vs InMotion's 10GB limit. Data centers: ScalaHosting has 13 global locations vs InMotion's 2 US locations. InMotion's genuine advantage: US-based phone support and longer track record. At renewal pricing, ScalaHosting VPS is cost-competitive.


Final Verdict: Who Should Use InMotion in 2026

Bento dashboard showing InMotion best for US small-business blogs under 20k visits, poor fit for WooCommerce or EU/APAC audie
3-year hosting cost comparison: ScalaHosting $154, Hostinger $300, Bluehost $323, ChemiCloud $329, SiteGround $480

InMotion Hosting is a legitimate, independently-owned US web host with genuine strengths: US-based 24/7 phone support, cPanel familiarity, and competitive intro pricing. These are real advantages that matter to a specific type of user.

But our 12-month benchmark testing reveals three critical problems that disqualify InMotion for most serious use cases:

  1. The Apache Bottleneck: 320ms TTFB at idle, 520ms at 100 concurrent users (178% degradation), 8.3% error rate under load. This is an architectural limitation, not fixable with plugins or configuration.
  2. The Backup Policy Gap: Automated backups stop when your account exceeds 10GB. No notification. WooCommerce stores commonly exceed this within 6-12 months.
  3. The Renewal Pricing Trap: 247-535% price increases at renewal. The Power plan goes from $2.99/mo to $18.99/mo, more expensive than Cloudways' entry plan, which is 152% faster.

InMotion Hosting, Final Verdict Scores

CategoryScoreNotes
CategoryScoreNotes
Speed / Performance5.8/10320ms TTFB, Apache bottleneck, 178% load degradation
Value for Money6.2/10Good intro price, severe renewal shock
Reliability7.1/1099.97% uptime, meets guarantee
Support Quality8.5/10Genuine US-based support, phone available
Renewal Fairness3.2/10247-535% renewal increase
WooCommerce Suitability4.2/10580ms checkout, 10GB backup limit
Overall6.1/10Adequate for small US sites only

The Bottom Line

Use InMotion if: You're running a small US-based business site with under 20,000 monthly visitors, you need US-based phone support, you're cPanel-familiar, and your site is under 10GB. InMotion will serve you adequately.

Don't use InMotion if: You're running WooCommerce (580ms checkout TTFB), your site has EU/APAC audiences (only 2 US data centers), you expect traffic spikes (Apache bottleneck), your site is over 10GB (no automated backups), or you need developer tools (no Git/SSH-first workflow).

The better alternatives:

  • ScalaHosting VPS, For performance: 28ms TTFB, LiteSpeed, backups for all sizes, 13 global data centers. At renewal pricing, cost-competitive with InMotion Power.
  • Cloudways, For developers: 72ms TTFB, Git deployment, 5 cloud providers, pay-as-you-go billing. Use code CLOUDS2022 for $30 free credit.
ScalaHosting, The InMotion Alternative That Actually Performs Logo
Why Scalahosting Beats Inmotion
  • AMD EPYC 9474F (#31 PassMark), 480% faster than InMotion's hardware
  • OpenLiteSpeed (not Apache), 3-5x better concurrent request handling
  • 28ms TTFB vs InMotion's ~320ms, 123% faster
  • 33ms at 100 concurrent users (+19% degradation) vs InMotion's 520ms (+178%)
  • Backups for ALL account sizes, not just under 10GB
  • SPanel free, saves $180/yr vs cPanel, uses 8x less RAM
  • No CPU steal, no I/O throttle, no hidden VPS limits
  • Email hosting included with no shared IP reputation issues
  • 13 data centers vs InMotion's 2 US locations
  • Anytime money-back guarantee
Where Inmotion Has An Edge
  • Renewal jumps ~200% after intro term ($29.95 → ~$82/mo)
  • No shared hosting entry point, VPS minimum $29.95/mo
  • Support varies by agent, L1 can miss nuanced issues
  • Documentation less comprehensive than InMotion's knowledge base

Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-12)

  • Avg TTFB (Global, 10-location test): 51ms
  • Uptime (measured, 54-day window): 100.0%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 83/100
28ms TTFB | AMD EPYC 9474F #31 PassMark | LiteSpeed vs InMotion Apache
ScalaHosting Homepage

$29.95/mo

Anytime Money-Back Guarantee

Visit ScalaHosting ➦

View ScalaHosting Plans, The InMotion Alternative ➦