Hostinger Review 2026: Real Speed Data + The 48-Month Pricing Trap Explained

Disclosure: some hosting links on this page earn me a commission if you buy. Pricing and benchmark data are verified independently. Full disclosure.

Mangesh Supe, Hosting Performance Analyst

By

Founder, ThatMy.com • Independent Hosting Benchmarks • ISP & Network Infrastructure Background

X LinkedIn How we test →

Hostinger Review 2026: Real Speed Data + The 48-Month Pricing Trap Explained

Disclosure: This content is reader-supported, which means if you click on some of our links that we may earn a commission.

Quick Verdict: Is Hostinger Worth It in 2026?

Hostinger benchmark summary: 145ms TTFB, 99.95% uptime, 520ms at 100 users (Premium plan, our test)
Speed / Performance (under load)
3.5/10
Value for Money (intro pricing)
7.5/10
Ease of Use (hPanel)
8.5/10
Support Quality
6.0/10
Renewal Fairness
3.0/10

Hostinger is the cheapest shared hosting I've tested at $2.99/mo intro. At idle, 145ms TTFB is acceptable for low-traffic sites. The hPanel control panel is clean and beginner-friendly. LiteSpeed Web Server gives it a performance edge over Apache-based hosts.

But here's what the other reviews don't tell you: Hostinger times out at 100 concurrent users. CPU steal throttling under sustained load causes TTFB to spike from 145ms to 2,000ms+. The renewal price jumps 268% ($2.99 → $10.99/mo). WooCommerce checkout TTFB is 520ms, 4.7x slower than ScalaHosting. Email deliverability is only 72% (28% of emails go to spam).

The honest verdict: Hostinger is the right choice for budget bloggers with under 5,000 monthly visitors who don't need WooCommerce. For anyone with real traffic, a WooCommerce store, or business email needs, the performance failures under load make Hostinger a liability.

✅ Hostinger Is Right For:

  • Budget bloggers under 5k monthly visitors
  • Personal portfolio sites
  • Students learning WordPress
  • Side projects with no revenue
  • Developers who need a cheap sandbox environment
  • Anyone who needs the absolute cheapest hosting for a non-critical site

❌ Hostinger Is NOT Right For:

  • WooCommerce stores with real traffic (→ ScalaHosting)
  • Sites expecting traffic spikes (→ Cloudways)
  • Business email users (→ ScalaHosting or Google Workspace)
  • Sites needing staging environment (→ ScalaHosting or Cloudways)
  • Anyone who can't handle 200% renewal price increase
  • Developers who need SSH/Git workflow (→ Cloudways)
Hostinger Shared Hosting, Full Review 2026 Logo
What Hostinger Does Well
  • Cheapest intro pricing tested: $2.99/mo (Premium plan)
  • 145ms idle TTFB, acceptable for low-traffic sites
  • hPanel is clean and beginner-friendly
  • LiteSpeed Web Server (faster than Apache)
  • Free SSL, free domain (1 year), free email hosting
  • 99.91% uptime, meets advertised 99.9% SLA
  • 100+ data centers globally
  • LiteSpeed Cache plugin (free, powerful)
Real Weaknesses (test Data)
  • TIMEOUT at 100 concurrent users, site becomes unavailable
  • CPU steal throttling under sustained load (documented)
  • Renewal price: $2.99/mo → $8.99/mo = 200% increase
  • No backups on Premium plan ($2.99/mo), must pay extra
  • Email deliverability: ~72% inbox rate (shared IP pool)
  • No staging environment on shared hosting
  • 520ms WooCommerce checkout TTFB (vs 187ms on ScalaHosting)
  • Support avg 4.2 hours response (not true 24/7 live chat)

Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-10)

  • Avg TTFB (Global, 10-location test): 205ms
  • Uptime (measured, 54-day window): 99.97%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 82/100
145ms TTFB (idle) | 520ms at 100 users | 99.95% Uptime | $2.99/mo intro → $8.99/mo renewal
Hostinger Homepage

CA$2.79/mo

Cheapest intro price, but read the renewal pricing

Visit Hostinger ➦

View Hostinger Plans ➦


Test Environment & Methodology

Every benchmark in this review is reproducible. Here's exactly what I tested and how.

🔬 Test Environment, Full Disclosure

WordPress Version6.7.2
PHP Version8.3 (latest stable)
ThemeHello Starter (lightweight)
Plugins12 (Yoast, WooCommerce, Elementor, Wordfence, etc.)
Plan TestedUnlimited Shared Hosting ($3.99/mo intro, renamed from Business)
Server RegionUS East (Ashburn, VA)
TTFB ToolWebPageTest (New York, London, Sydney)
Load Test ToolLoader.io (US East)
Uptime MonitorUptimeRobot Pro (1-min checks, 12 months)
CDN StatusDisabled for all origin tests
Page CacheDisabled for TTFB tests
Test PeriodJanuary-February 2026

All TTFB tests were run with CDN disabled and page caching disabled, measuring pure server response time. Load tests simulated real concurrent WordPress visitors using Loader.io's ramp-up mode. The same 12-plugin WordPress stack was used across all providers for fair comparison.


TTFB Results: 3 Locations, No CDN

All tests run with CDN disabled, page caching disabled. Pure server response time from WebPageTest. Unlimited Shared Hosting, Ashburn VA server.

TTFB New York

Hostinger shared TTFB test: 145ms average from US locations (Premium plan, our test)

New York (Primary Test Location)

145ms
TTFB, New York
3-run average, no CDN, no page cache
<200ms
Google "Good" Threshold
Just under the Core Web Vitals limit
+55ms
Slower Than ScalaHosting
ScalaHosting: 28ms at idle

145ms TTFB from New York is acceptable at idle, just under Google's 200ms "good" threshold. But this is the best-case scenario: idle server, no concurrent users, no CPU steal. The load test results tell a very different story.

London (EU Origin)

245ms TTFB from London reflects the transatlantic latency from Hostinger's Ashburn VA server. EU visitors experience a 47ms penalty vs US visitors. With Cloudflare CDN enabled (free tier), this drops to 30-50ms for cached pages.

Sydney (APAC Origin)

380ms TTFB from Sydney is poor for APAC audiences. If you have significant APAC traffic, Cloudflare CDN is not optional, it's required. Without CDN, APAC visitors experience 380ms TTFB on every page load.

TTFB by Location (No CDN, Unlimited Shared Hosting)

LocationHostingerScalaHostingCloudways (Vultr HF)ChemiCloud
LocationHostingerScalaHostingCloudways (Vultr HF)ChemiCloud
New York145ms ⚠️28ms ✅72ms ✅220ms ⚠️
London245ms ⚠️168ms ✅165ms ✅265ms ⚠️
Sydney380ms ❌287ms ⚠️210ms ✅395ms ❌

⚠️ Important: These Are Idle TTFB Numbers

145ms looks acceptable here. But this is with zero concurrent users and no CPU steal. Under 100 concurrent users, Hostinger's TTFB rises to 2,000ms+ before timing out. Idle TTFB on its own does not predict performance under real traffic, so it is worth reading this number alongside the load-test section that follows.


Load Test: The Real Story (Timeout at 100 Users)

Idle TTFB is easy. The real test is what happens when real traffic hits simultaneously. This is where Hostinger's shared hosting architecture fails.

Load Test Timeout

Hostinger load test response: 10 users 210ms, 25 users 340ms, 50 users 580ms, 100 users timeout
210ms
10 Concurrent Users
Baseline, acceptable
580ms
50 Concurrent Users
+176% degradation
TIMEOUT ❌
100 Concurrent Users
Site becomes unavailable

Load Test Results (Loader.io, US East)

Concurrent UsersHostingerScalaHostingCloudways (Vultr HF)ChemiCloud
Concurrent UsersHostingerScalaHostingCloudways (Vultr HF)ChemiCloud
10 users210ms148ms132ms235ms
25 users340ms153ms139ms280ms
50 users580ms31ms145ms340ms
100 usersTIMEOUT ❌33ms (+19%)168ms (+32%)420ms (+79%)

The data is unambiguous: Hostinger times out at 100 concurrent users. This means your site becomes completely unavailable when 100 people try to visit simultaneously. For context, a modest blog post going viral on Reddit or Twitter can easily generate 100+ concurrent visitors.

ScalaHosting maintains 33ms at 100 users, only 19% degradation from baseline. Cloudways maintains 168ms at 100 users, 32% degradation. ChemiCloud degrades to 420ms but stays functional. Hostinger is the only provider that fails entirely.

❌ What "Timeout at 100 Users" Means in Practice

  • A Reddit post linking to your site → site goes down
  • A product launch email to 500 subscribers → checkout unavailable
  • A Google Discover feature → site crashes during the traffic spike
  • A WooCommerce flash sale → customers can't complete purchases

If any of these scenarios apply to your site, Hostinger is not a safe choice.


CPU Throttling: What Actually Happens Under Load

CPU Steal Verification

Hostinger CPU steal in our load test: 5% at 10 users, 45% at 50, 85% at 100 as TTFB climbed past 2,000ms

The root cause of Hostinger's load test failure is CPU steal, a shared hosting mechanism where the hypervisor limits how much CPU time your virtual server can use when the physical host is under load.

What CPU Steal Is

On shared hosting, multiple virtual servers share the same physical CPU. When demand exceeds capacity, the hypervisor "steals" CPU time from your server to give to other tenants. This is measured as "CPU steal %" in Linux's top command.

Hostinger CPU Steal Under Load (Documented)

  • Idle (0 users): ~5% CPU steal, negligible
  • 10 concurrent users: ~15% CPU steal, minor impact
  • 25 concurrent users: ~35% CPU steal, noticeable slowdown
  • 50 concurrent users: ~65% CPU steal, severe degradation
  • 100 concurrent users: ~85% CPU steal, site times out

At 85% CPU steal, your server has only 15% of its CPU available. WordPress requires CPU for every dynamic page request. With 15% CPU available and 100 concurrent requests, the server queue fills and requests time out.

How to Detect CPU Steal on Hostinger

If you're on Hostinger and suspect CPU steal, SSH into your server (Unlimited plan and above) and run:

top -b -n 1 | head -5

Look for the st value in the CPU line. Above 10% is concerning. Above 30% means your site is being throttled. Above 50% means severe performance degradation.

Why ScalaHosting Doesn't Have This Problem

ScalaHosting's VPS plans use dedicated CPU resources, no CPU steal, no I/O throttling, no hidden limits. Their official policy: "There are no limits on any of our cloud virtual servers." Our load tests confirm this: ScalaHosting's TTFB only increased 19% at 100 concurrent users, with zero CPU steal behavior.

Bento dashboard showing Hostinger hPanel resource panels for CPU, RAM, disk I/O with throttle threshold callout

Uptime: 12-Month Monitoring Data

12-Month Uptime Monitoring

UptimeRobot 12-month uptime: Hostinger 99.91%, Cloudways 99.981%, ScalaHosting 99.993%, Hostinger longest outage 47 min
99.91%
Hostinger Uptime (12mo)
~7.9 hours downtime/year
47 min
Longest Single Outage
Documented in monitoring data
99.9%
Advertised SLA
Hostinger meets its own guarantee

Uptime Comparison (12-Month UptimeRobot Pro)

HostUptime (12mo)Downtime/YearLongest Outage
HostUptime (12mo)Downtime/YearLongest Outage
ScalaHosting99.993% ✅~37 min~12 min
Cloudways (Vultr HF)99.981% ✅~101 min~28 min
ChemiCloud99.97% ✅~2.6 hrs~35 min
Hostinger99.91% ⚠️~7.9 hrs47 min

Hostinger's 99.91% uptime meets its advertised 99.9% SLA, so technically, Hostinger is delivering what it promises. But 7.9 hours of downtime per year is 8x more than ScalaHosting's 37 minutes. For a WooCommerce store, 7.9 hours of downtime per year at an average order value of $50 and 10 orders/hour = $3,950 in lost revenue annually.

For non-critical sites (blogs, portfolios, side projects), 99.91% uptime is acceptable. For business sites, the uptime gap between Hostinger and ScalaHosting is significant.


Pricing: The Real Cost (Intro vs Renewal)

Hostinger shared plan pricing and renewal comparison table
Hostinger Cloud - Plan Pricing: Cloud Startup, Cloud Professional
Hostinger Shared - Plan Pricing: Premium, Unlimited
Hostinger Vps - Plan Pricing: KVM 1, KVM 2
Hostinger Cloud - Plan Specs & Hardware: Cloud Startup, Cloud Professional
Hostinger Shared - Plan Specs & Hardware: Premium, Unlimited
Hostinger Vps - Plan Specs & Hardware: KVM 1, KVM 2
Hostinger Cloud - Tier Performance (Tested): Cloud Startup, Cloud Professional
Hostinger Vps - Tier Performance (Tested): KVM 1, KVM 2

Hostinger's pricing strategy is designed to attract with low intro prices and retain with high renewal prices. Here's the full picture:

Hostinger Pricing: Intro vs Renewal

PlanIntro PriceRenewal PriceIncreaseBackups
PlanIntro PriceRenewal PriceIncreaseBackups
Premium$2.99/mo$10.99/mo+268% ❌Weekly ✅
Unlimited$3.99/mo$16.99/mo+326% ❌Daily ✅
Cloud Startup$9.99/mo$25.99/mo+160% ⚠️Daily ✅
Cloud Professional$14.99/mo$34.99/mo+133% ⚠️Daily ✅

The True 4-Year Cost

If you sign up for a 4-year term at $3.99/mo (Unlimited plan), your first 4 years cost the initial discounted cost. At renewal, you pay $16.99/mo, so the next 4 years cost a much higher sum. Total 8-year cost: a massive total cost.

Compare to ScalaHosting Build #1: $29.95/mo intro for 2 years = a significant upfront cost, then a premium rate renewal. The gap narrows significantly when you account for renewal pricing.

❌ Hidden Costs on Hostinger

  • Domain privacy: $9.99/yr (not included)
  • Backups on Premium plan: $2.99/mo extra (not included)
  • Business email reliability: Need Zoho Mail ($1/mo) or Google Workspace ($6/mo) for reliable delivery
  • True cost for a production setup: Unlimited plan ($16.99/mo renewal) + domain privacy ($0.83/mo) + reliable email ($1/mo) = $18.82/mo at renewal

The "Unlimited" Myth Exposed

Hostinger advertises "unlimited bandwidth," "unlimited databases," and "unlimited email accounts." Here's what "unlimited" actually means in Hostinger's Terms of Service:

What Hostinger's ToS Actually Says About "Unlimited"

  • Bandwidth: "Unlimited" subject to "fair use policy", sustained high bandwidth triggers throttling
  • CPU: "Fair use policy" = CPU steal throttling under sustained load (documented above)
  • Databases: "Unlimited" but with performance limits, too many large databases slow down all sites on the shared server
  • Email accounts: "Unlimited" but with sending limits, 500 emails/day on Premium plan
  • Storage: 20GB (Premium) or 50GB (Unlimited plan), not unlimited

The "unlimited" marketing is standard in shared hosting. The reality is that all shared hosting has resource limits, they're just not disclosed upfront. Hostinger's limits are more aggressive than most because they're optimizing for the lowest possible price point.

What Triggers Throttling

  • Sustained CPU usage above ~30% for more than 30 seconds
  • High disk I/O (large file uploads, database-heavy operations)
  • High concurrent PHP processes (WooCommerce checkout, membership sites)
  • Large email sending volumes (newsletters, WooCommerce order notifications)

For a simple blog with occasional traffic, you'll never hit these limits. For a WooCommerce store or membership site, you'll hit them regularly.


hPanel Deep-Dive: Pros and Cons

Decision tree of Hostinger hPanel sections: websites, email, file manager, WordPress manager, PHP selector, staging tier gate

hPanel is Hostinger's proprietary control panel, replacing the industry-standard cPanel. It's genuinely well-designed for beginners, but has real limitations for advanced users.

hPanel vs cPanel vs SPanel

FeaturehPanelcPanelSPanel (ScalaHosting)
FeaturehPanelcPanelSPanel (ScalaHosting)
Learning curveLow ✅MediumMedium
File managerBasic ⚠️Full-featured ✅Full-featured ✅
Email managementSimple ✅Full-featured ✅Full-featured ✅
Database managementBasic ⚠️phpMyAdmin ✅phpMyAdmin ✅
SSH accessUnlimited+ only ⚠️All plans ✅All plans ✅
Staging environmentNot available ❌VariesIncluded ✅
PHP version switching1-click ✅1-click ✅1-click ✅
WordPress managerBuilt-in ✅SoftaculousBuilt-in ✅
CostIncluded$15-20/mo extraIncluded ✅

What hPanel Does Well

  • Clean UI: The dashboard is uncluttered and intuitive for beginners
  • Fast navigation: Key features are accessible in 1-2 clicks
  • WordPress manager: Built-in WordPress installation, updates, and staging (Cloud plans only)
  • PHP version switching: 1-click PHP version change without server restart
  • Free SSL: Let's Encrypt SSL with auto-renewal, 1-click activation

What hPanel Lacks

  • No staging environment on shared hosting plans (Cloud plans only)
  • Limited SSH access, only available on Unlimited plan and above
  • Basic file manager, lacks the power of cPanel's file manager for bulk operations
  • Non-standard, cPanel-specific tools and plugins don't work with hPanel
  • Migration complexity, migrating from cPanel to hPanel requires manual steps

WordPress Performance Stack

Layer stack showing Hostinger shared cache: page cache, browser cache, Cloudflare CDN active but object cache unavailable

Hostinger uses LiteSpeed Web Server on all shared hosting plans, a genuine advantage over Apache-based hosts. LiteSpeed handles concurrent connections more efficiently and includes native support for the LiteSpeed Cache plugin.

Hostinger's WordPress Stack

  • Web server: LiteSpeed (faster than Apache for WordPress)
  • PHP: PHP-FPM 8.3 (latest stable)
  • Caching: LiteSpeed Cache plugin (free, powerful page cache)
  • Object cache: Not available on shared hosting (Unlimited plan and below)
  • CDN: Cloudflare integration (free tier)
  • Database: MySQL 8.0

How to Get the Best Performance from Hostinger

  1. Install LiteSpeed Cache plugin, enable Page Cache and Browser Cache
  2. Enable Cloudflare CDN, reduces TTFB for EU/APAC visitors from 245-380ms to 30-50ms
  3. Use PHP 8.3, 20-30% faster than PHP 7.4 for WordPress
  4. Optimize images, use WebP format, lazy loading
  5. Minimize plugins, each plugin adds PHP execution time

⚠️ Object Cache Not Available on Shared Hosting

Object caching (Redis/Memcached) is not available on Hostinger's shared hosting plans. Object cache is critical for WooCommerce performance, it caches database queries and reduces PHP execution time by 40-60%. Without object cache, WooCommerce checkout TTFB on Hostinger is 520ms. ScalaHosting and Cloudways both include object caching, which is why their WooCommerce checkout TTFB is 187ms and 195ms respectively.

Hostinger GTmetrix report, Grade B: LCP 2.1s, TBT 180ms, CLS 0.02 from Vancouver origin test

WooCommerce Performance Test

WooCommerce Performance

WooCommerce checkout TTFB, uncached: ScalaHosting 187ms, Cloudways 195, ChemiCloud 310, SiteGround 410, Hostinger 520

WooCommerce is Hostinger's weakest use case. Here's why:

  1. Checkout pages cannot be cached, every checkout page load hits the server directly
  2. No object cache on shared hosting, database queries run on every request
  3. CPU steal under load, checkout during traffic spikes triggers throttling
  4. 520ms checkout TTFB, 4.7x slower than ScalaHosting's 187ms

WooCommerce Checkout Speed Test

HostCheckout TTFBObject CacheLoad (100 users)
HostCheckout TTFBObject CacheLoad (100 users)
ScalaHosting187ms ✅Redis included ✅33ms ✅
Cloudways195ms ✅Redis Pro included ✅168ms ✅
ChemiCloud310ms ⚠️Not included ❌420ms ⚠️
Hostinger520ms ❌Not available ❌TIMEOUT ❌

The 520ms checkout TTFB on Hostinger is not just a performance issue, it's a conversion issue. Research shows that every 100ms increase in checkout page load time reduces conversion rates by ~1%. Hostinger's 520ms checkout vs ScalaHosting's 187ms = 7ms difference × ~7% conversion rate impact.

Recommendation: Do not use Hostinger for WooCommerce stores with real traffic. Use ScalaHosting (187ms checkout, Redis included, no CPU steal) or Cloudways (195ms checkout, Redis Pro included).


Email Hosting Quality Test

Inbox delivery in our 100-email test: Hostinger 72%, ChemiCloud 91%, ScalaHosting 94%, Google Workspace 99%

Hostinger includes email hosting on all shared plans, unlike Cloudways, which requires a separate email service. But "included" doesn't mean "good."

72%
Hostinger Inbox Rate
28% of emails go to spam
94%
ScalaHosting Inbox Rate
Dedicated IP pool
99%
Google Workspace
Best-in-class deliverability

We sent 100 test emails from Hostinger's email hosting to Gmail, Outlook, and Yahoo accounts. 72% reached the inbox, meaning 28 out of every 100 emails went to spam. This is caused by Hostinger's shared IP pools having poor sender reputation from other users on the same IP.

Email Deliverability Recommendations

  • Personal use: Hostinger's 72% inbox rate is acceptable for personal email
  • Business email: Use Zoho Mail ($1/mo per user), 95%+ inbox rate, professional features
  • WooCommerce order notifications: Use Mailgun or SendGrid (free tier for low volume), 99%+ deliverability
  • Newsletters: Use Mailchimp or ConvertKit, never send newsletters from shared hosting email

Support Quality: 8 Tickets, Real Response Times

Hostinger support across our 8 tickets: fastest 1.5 hours, average 4.2, slowest 8.7; ScalaHosting averaged 1.8

We submitted 8 support tickets over 30 days covering a range of topics: performance issues, DNS configuration, email setup, WordPress errors, and billing questions.

Support Response Time Test (30 Days, 8 Tickets)

Ticket #TopicChannelResponse TimeResolution
Ticket #TopicChannelResponse TimeResolution
1WordPress 500 errorLive Chat1.5 hrsResolved ✅
2DNS propagationLive Chat2.1 hrsResolved ✅
3Email deliverabilityTicket3.8 hrsPartial ⚠️
4CPU usage spikeTicket4.2 hrsEscalated ⚠️
5PHP version changeLive Chat5.1 hrsResolved ✅
6Backup restorationTicket6.3 hrsResolved ✅
7SSL certificate errorLive Chat7.9 hrsResolved ✅
8Billing questionLive Chat8.7 hrsResolved ✅

Average response time: 4.2 hours. This is significantly slower than Hostinger's advertised "24/7 live chat" implies. The live chat is available, but wait times are often 30-60 minutes during peak hours. L1 agents handle most tickets, complex issues (CPU throttling, email deliverability) required escalation to L2.

For comparison, ScalaHosting's average response time in our test was 1.8 hours, with L2 agents handling technical issues directly.


Plans Explained: Which One to Pick

Hostinger plans table: Premium, Unlimited, Cloud Startup, Cloud Professional across price, websites, storage, backups, workers

Hostinger Plans Comparison

FeaturePremium ($2.99)Unlimited ($3.99)Cloud Startup ($9.99)Cloud Professional ($14.99)
FeaturePremium ($2.99)Unlimited ($3.99)Cloud Startup ($9.99)Cloud Professional ($14.99)
Websites3Unlimited300300
Storage20GB SSD50GB NVMe200GB NVMe200GB NVMe
BackupsWeekly ✅Daily ✅Daily ✅Daily ✅
Object CacheNo ❌No ❌Yes ✅Yes ✅
StagingNo ❌Yes ✅Yes ✅Yes ✅
SSH AccessNo ❌Yes ✅Yes ✅Yes ✅
PHP WorkersSharedSharedDedicatedDedicated
Renewal Price$10.99/mo$16.99/mo$25.99/mo$34.99/mo

Which Plan to Choose

  • Premium ($2.99/mo), Fine for a single site. 3 websites, weekly backups now included (added 2026-08). No staging, no SSH. Reasonable for a single low-traffic blog; upgrade to Unlimited once you need more than 3 sites.
  • Unlimited ($3.99/mo), Minimum viable for multiple sites. Unlimited websites, daily backups, SSH access, staging. This is the minimum plan we recommend once you're running more than 3 sites.
  • Cloud Startup ($9.99/mo), Actually good. Dedicated resources, daily backups, staging environment, object cache. This is where Hostinger becomes a legitimate option for medium-traffic sites.
  • Cloud Professional ($14.99/mo), Compare to ScalaHosting. At $14.99/mo intro (→ $34.99/mo renewal), you're approaching ScalaHosting's $29.95/mo intro price, with significantly better performance and no CPU steal.

Hostinger vs ScalaHosting (Head-to-Head)

Hostinger vs Hosting.com: 145ms vs 185ms TTFB, 99.95% vs 99.93% uptime (our tests)

Hostinger vs ScalaHosting: Full Comparison

FeatureHostinger UnlimitedScalaHosting Build #1
FeatureHostinger UnlimitedScalaHosting Build #1
Intro Price$3.99/mo$29.95/mo
Renewal Price$16.99/moa premium rate
TTFB (idle)145ms ⚠️28ms ✅
Load (100 users)TIMEOUT ❌33ms ✅
WooCommerce Checkout520ms ❌187ms ✅
Uptime (12mo)99.91% ⚠️99.993% ✅
CPU StealYes (throttled) ❌No (dedicated) ✅
Email HostingIncluded (72% inbox) ⚠️Included (94% inbox) ✅
BackupsDaily (Unlimited) ✅Daily (included) ✅
StagingNo ❌Yes (SPanel) ✅
Support Response4.2 hrs avg ⚠️1.8 hrs avg ✅

Verdict: ScalaHosting wins on every performance metric. Hostinger wins on intro price. The question is whether the 10x price difference ($3.99 vs $29.95/mo) is worth the performance gap.

For budget bloggers under 5k monthly visitors: Hostinger is fine. For WooCommerce stores, membership sites, or any site with real traffic: ScalaHosting's performance advantage is worth the price premium. The 4.7x faster WooCommerce checkout alone can pay for the price difference in recovered conversions.

ScalaHosting, The Upgrade Path from Hostinger Logo
Why Users Upgrade To Scalahosting
  • 33ms at 100 concurrent users (Hostinger times out at same load)
  • 187ms WooCommerce checkout TTFB (vs 520ms on Hostinger)
  • 99.993% uptime, 7x less downtime than Hostinger
  • No CPU steal, no I/O throttle, no hidden limits
  • SPanel free, email, backups, staging all included
  • AMD EPYC 9474F (#31 PassMark), dedicated resources
  • Anytime money-back guarantee
  • Free migration from Hostinger
Scalahosting Limitations
  • $29.95/mo minimum, 10x more expensive than Hostinger intro
  • Renewal price jumps ~200% after intro term
  • No shared hosting entry tier
  • SPanel learning curve if migrating from hPanel

Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-12)

  • Avg TTFB (Global, 10-location test): 51ms
  • Uptime (measured, 54-day window): 100.0%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 83/100
28ms TTFB | 33ms at 100 users (19% degradation) | 99.993% Uptime | AMD EPYC 9474F
ScalaHosting Homepage

$29.95/mo

Anytime Money-Back Guarantee + Free Migration

Visit ScalaHosting ➦

Visit ScalaHosting, Anytime Money-Back Guarantee ➦


Hostinger vs Cloudways

Hostinger vs Cloudways: Full Comparison

FeatureHostinger UnlimitedCloudways (Vultr HF)
FeatureHostinger UnlimitedCloudways (Vultr HF)
Intro Price$3.99/mo$14/mo (pay-as-you-go)
Renewal Price$16.99/moSame (no renewal shock)
TTFB (idle)145ms ⚠️72ms ✅
Load (100 users)TIMEOUT ❌168ms ✅
WooCommerce Checkout520ms ❌195ms ✅
Uptime (12mo)99.91% ⚠️99.981% ✅
Email HostingIncluded (poor) ⚠️Not included ❌
Developer ToolsBasic ❌Git, SSH, WP-CLI ✅
StagingNo ❌Yes ✅
Object CacheNo ❌Redis Pro included ✅
BillingAnnual contractPay-as-you-go ✅

Cloudways wins on performance, 72ms vs 145ms TTFB, 168ms vs timeout at 100 users, 195ms vs 520ms WooCommerce checkout. Pay-as-you-go billing means no renewal price shock. Best developer tooling: Git deployment, SSH, WP-CLI, staging.

Hostinger wins on price, $3.99/mo intro vs $14/mo minimum on Cloudways. Hostinger includes email hosting (even if poor quality); Cloudways requires a separate email service ($6-12/mo).

Verdict: Cloudways for developers and agencies who need performance and flexibility. Hostinger for budget users who need the cheapest possible hosting and don't need developer tools. Use code CLOUDS2022 for $30 free credit on Cloudways.

Cloudways, Best Raw Speed, Developer-Focused Logo
Where Cloudways Beats Hostinger
  • 72ms idle TTFB, 36% faster than Hostinger at idle
  • 168ms at 100 concurrent users (Hostinger times out at same load)
  • 99.981% uptime, 7x less downtime than Hostinger
  • Pay-as-you-go billing, no renewal price shock
  • Redis Object Cache Pro included free ($99/yr value)
  • Git deployment, SSH, WP-CLI, staging, best developer tooling
  • 5 cloud providers: Vultr HF, DigitalOcean, AWS, GCE, Linode
  • Code CLOUDS2022 = $30 free credit to test
Cloudways Limitations Vs Hostinger
  • No email hosting, add $6-12/mo for Google Workspace
  • $14/mo minimum vs Hostinger $2.99/mo intro
  • No cPanel, custom Cloudways panel only
  • Migration costs $50/site (or DIY free)
  • More complex setup, not beginner-friendly

Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-12)

  • Avg TTFB (Global, 10-location test): 132ms
  • Uptime (measured, 54-day window): 99.98%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 89/100
72ms TTFB (Vultr HF) | 168ms at 100 users | 99.981% Uptime | CLOUDS2022 = $30 Free
Cloudways Homepage

$14.00/mo

CLOUDS2022 = $30 Free Credit

Try Cloudways Free ➦

Try Cloudways Free, Code CLOUDS2022 = $30 Credit ➦


Hostinger vs ChemiCloud

Hostinger vs ChemiCloud: Full Comparison

FeatureHostinger UnlimitedChemiCloud Pro
FeatureHostinger UnlimitedChemiCloud Pro
Intro Price$3.99/mo$3.95/mo
Renewal Price$16.99/mo~$9.95/mo ✅
TTFB (idle)145ms ✅220ms ⚠️
Load (100 users)TIMEOUT ❌420ms (stable) ✅
Uptime (12mo)99.91% ⚠️99.97% ✅
CPU StealYes (aggressive) ❌No ✅
Daily BackupsNo (weekly only) ❌Yes (included) ✅
Free Domain1 year only ⚠️For life ✅
Email Inbox Rate72% ❌91% ✅
Money-Back30 days ⚠️45 days ✅
Control PanelhPanel (custom)cPanel (standard) ✅

ChemiCloud wins on reliability, no CPU steal, daily backups included, 99.97% uptime, 91% email inbox rate, free domain for life, 45-day money-back guarantee. At nearly the same intro price ($3.95 vs $3.99/mo), ChemiCloud offers significantly better value.

Hostinger wins on idle TTFB, 145ms vs 220ms at idle. Hostinger also has more data center locations and a larger brand with more community tutorials.

Verdict: ChemiCloud is the better budget choice for users who want reliability over the absolute cheapest price. Hostinger is better if you need the lowest possible idle TTFB or prefer a larger brand with more community support.

ChemiCloud, Best Budget Alternative to Hostinger Logo
Why Chemicloud Beats Hostinger
  • No CPU steal throttling, stable performance under load
  • Daily backups included on all plans (Hostinger charges extra)
  • Free domain for life (not just 1 year like Hostinger)
  • cPanel included, familiar interface for WordPress users
  • Staging environment included on Business plan
  • Email deliverability: ~91% inbox rate (vs Hostinger 72%)
  • 45-day money-back guarantee (vs Hostinger 30 days)
  • Renewal pricing more transparent than Hostinger
Chemicloud Limitations
  • 220ms idle TTFB, slightly slower than Hostinger 145ms at idle
  • Fewer data center locations than Hostinger
  • Smaller brand, less community support/tutorials
  • No LiteSpeed Web Server on basic plans
  • Limited to 1 website on Starter plan

Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-16)

  • Avg TTFB (Global, 10-location test): 187ms
  • Uptime (measured, 54-day window): 99.97%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 84/100
220ms TTFB | 99.97% Uptime | $3.95/mo intro | Best Budget Alternative to Hostinger
ChemiCloud Homepage

$3.95/mo

45-Day Money-Back + Free Domain for Life

Visit ChemiCloud ➦

Visit ChemiCloud, 45-Day Money-Back Guarantee ➦


Who Should NOT Use Hostinger

❌ Do NOT Use Hostinger If You Have Any of These Needs:

  • WooCommerce stores with real traffic, 520ms checkout TTFB, timeout at 100 users. Use ScalaHosting (187ms checkout, no CPU steal)
  • Sites expecting traffic spikes, Hostinger times out at 100 concurrent users. Use Cloudways (168ms at 100 users, autoscaling available)
  • Business email users, 72% inbox rate is unacceptable for business. Use ScalaHosting (94% inbox) or Google Workspace (99% inbox)
  • Sites needing staging environment, Not available on shared hosting. Use ScalaHosting (SPanel staging) or Cloudways (one-click staging)
  • Anyone who can't handle a 326% renewal price increase, Budget for $16.99/mo renewal on the Unlimited plan, not $3.99/mo
  • Developers who need SSH/Git workflow, Use Cloudways (Git deployment, SSH, WP-CLI built-in)
  • Membership sites or subscription businesses, Sustained load triggers CPU steal throttling
  • Sites with APAC audiences, 380ms TTFB from Sydney without CDN. Use a host with APAC data centers

Who Hostinger IS Good For

✅ Hostinger Is a Good Choice If:

  • Budget bloggers under 5k monthly visitors, 145ms idle TTFB is fine, CPU steal won't trigger at low traffic
  • Personal portfolio sites, Low traffic, no WooCommerce, no business email requirements
  • Students learning WordPress, Cheapest way to get a live WordPress site for practice
  • Side projects with no revenue, Downtime and slow load times are acceptable for non-critical projects
  • Developers who need a cheap sandbox environment, $3.99/mo for a test environment is hard to beat
  • Anyone who needs the cheapest possible hosting for a non-critical site, Hostinger is genuinely the cheapest option I've tested

The key qualifier is "non-critical." If your site generates revenue, has real traffic, or serves business purposes, the performance failures under load make Hostinger a liability. For hobby projects and learning environments, Hostinger's price is unbeatable.


How to Set Up Hostinger (7 Steps)

If you've decided Hostinger is right for your use case, here's the optimal setup process:

Step 1: Choose the Unlimited Plan (Minimum)

Hostinger plan choice for WordPress: Unlimited (renamed from Business) adds unlimited websites and staging over Premium; Cloud buys more headroom

Go to Hostinger's pricing page. Select the Unlimited plan ($3.99/mo, renamed from Business) if you need more than 3 sites or daily backups; the Premium plan ($2.99/mo) is a reasonable choice for a single site now that it includes weekly backups too.

Step 2: Select Your Server Location

Choose the data center closest to your primary audience:

  • US East (Ashburn, VA), for North American audiences
  • EU (Amsterdam or Vilnius), for European audiences
  • Asia (Singapore), for APAC audiences

Step 3: Complete Checkout, Avoid Upsells

Hostinger will offer several add-ons during checkout:

  • Domain privacy ($9.99/yr), Worth it. Protects your personal information from WHOIS lookup.
  • Additional backups ($2.99/mo), Skip. Unlimited plan includes daily backups.
  • Priority support, Skip. Not worth the cost for most users.

Step 4: Access hPanel

Log in to hpanel.hostinger.com. Spend 10 minutes exploring the dashboard: Websites, Email, Files, Databases, and Advanced sections. The interface is intuitive, most tasks are accessible in 1-2 clicks.

Step 5: Install WordPress

Hostinger WordPress setup: hPanel installer with domain and region selection, admin details, PHP 8.3, one-click install

In hPanel: Websites → Add Website → WordPress. Configure:

  • PHP version: Select PHP 8.3 (latest stable, 20-30% faster than PHP 7.4)
  • WordPress version: Latest (6.7.2 at time of writing)
  • Admin username: Don't use "admin", choose something unique
  • Region: Confirm your selected data center

Step 6: Install LiteSpeed Cache Plugin

In WordPress admin: Plugins → Add New → search "LiteSpeed Cache" → Install and Activate.

Configure: LiteSpeed Cache → Cache → enable:

  • ✅ Enable Cache
  • ✅ Cache Logged-in Users (disable for WooCommerce)
  • ✅ Browser Cache
  • ✅ Minify HTML, CSS, JS

Step 7: Configure Cloudflare CDN

Sign up for a free Cloudflare account. Add your domain. Update nameservers in hPanel → Domains → DNS. Enable Cloudflare's free CDN. This reduces TTFB for EU visitors from 245ms to 30-50ms and for APAC visitors from 380ms to 30-50ms.


Full Test Report: Hostinger Shared, by Plan

Here is the complete export from our test suite for every shared plan we benchmarked: Premium, and Unlimited (formerly Business). Each tab holds that plan's full run - server response time (TTFB), behavior under a 100-user load, the GTmetrix and PageSpeed captures, a Pingdom response-time check, our WordPress hosting benchmark, the regional TTFB scorecard, and 12 months of uptime tracking with the day-by-day calendar.

Premium (Featured) Unlimited

Hostinger shared TTFB test: 145ms from US on the Premium plan
Hostinger shared load test: 520ms at 100 concurrent users (Premium plan)
Hostinger shared GTmetrix speed test result, Premium plan
Hostinger shared PageSpeed Insights scores, Premium plan (our test)
Hostinger shared Pingdom load-time report, Premium plan (our test)
Hostinger shared WordPress hosting benchmark result, Premium plan
Hostinger shared TTFB by test region, Premium plan (our test)
Hostinger shared uptime: 99.95% over 12 months (Premium plan)
Hostinger shared uptime calendar by day, Premium plan (our test)
Hostinger Unlimited (shared hosting) TTFB / latency test from our benchmark suite
Hostinger Unlimited (shared hosting) load test from our benchmark suite
Hostinger Unlimited (shared hosting) page speed test from our benchmark suite
Hostinger shared PageSpeed Insights scores, Business plan (our test)
Hostinger shared Pingdom load-time report, Business plan (our test)
Hostinger Unlimited (shared hosting) WordPress benchmark from our benchmark suite
Hostinger shared TTFB by test region, Business plan (our test)
Hostinger Unlimited (shared hosting) uptime monitor results from our benchmark suite
Hostinger shared uptime calendar by day, Business plan (our test)

Full Test Report: Hostinger VPS, by Plan

Here is the complete export from our test suite for every vps plan we benchmarked: KVM 1, and KVM 2. Each tab holds that plan's full run - server response time (TTFB), behavior under a 100-user load, the GTmetrix and PageSpeed captures, a Pingdom response-time check, our WordPress hosting benchmark, the regional TTFB scorecard, and 12 months of uptime tracking with the day-by-day calendar.

KVM 1 (Featured) KVM 2

Hostinger vps TTFB test: 78ms from US on the KVM 1 plan
Hostinger vps load test: 142ms at 100 concurrent users (KVM 1 plan)
Hostinger vps GTmetrix speed test result, KVM 1 plan
Hostinger VPS PageSpeed Insights scores, KVM 1 plan (our test)
Hostinger VPS Pingdom load-time report, KVM 1 plan (our test)
Hostinger vps WordPress hosting benchmark result, KVM 1 plan
Hostinger VPS TTFB by test region, KVM 1 plan (our test)
Hostinger vps uptime: 99.96% over 12 months (KVM 1 plan)
Hostinger VPS uptime calendar by day, KVM 1 plan (our test)
Hostinger KVM 2 (VPS) TTFB / latency test from our benchmark suite
Hostinger KVM 2 (VPS) load test from our benchmark suite
Hostinger KVM 2 (VPS) page speed test from our benchmark suite
Hostinger VPS PageSpeed Insights scores, KVM 2 plan (our test)
Hostinger VPS Pingdom load-time report, KVM 2 plan (our test)
Hostinger KVM 2 (VPS) WordPress benchmark from our benchmark suite
Hostinger VPS TTFB by test region, KVM 2 plan (our test)
Hostinger KVM 2 (VPS) uptime monitor results from our benchmark suite
Hostinger VPS uptime calendar by day, KVM 2 plan (our test)

Full Test Report: Hostinger Cloud, by Plan

Here is the complete export from our test suite for every cloud plan we benchmarked: Cloud Startup, and Cloud Professional. Each tab holds that plan's full run - server response time (TTFB), behavior under a 100-user load, the GTmetrix and PageSpeed captures, a Pingdom response-time check, our WordPress hosting benchmark, the regional TTFB scorecard, and 12 months of uptime tracking with the day-by-day calendar.

Cloud Startup (Featured) Cloud Professional

Hostinger cloud TTFB test: 118ms from US on the Cloud Startup plan
Hostinger cloud load test: 300ms at 100 concurrent users (Cloud Startup plan)
Hostinger cloud GTmetrix speed test result, Cloud Startup plan
Hostinger cloud PageSpeed Insights scores, Startup plan (our test)
Hostinger cloud Pingdom load-time report, Startup plan (our test)
Hostinger cloud WordPress hosting benchmark result, Cloud Startup plan
Hostinger cloud TTFB by test region, Startup plan (our test)
Hostinger cloud uptime: 99.97% over 12 months (Cloud Startup plan)
Hostinger cloud uptime calendar by day, Startup plan (our test)
Hostinger Cloud Professional (cloud hosting) TTFB / latency test from our benchmark suite
Hostinger Cloud Professional (cloud hosting) load test from our benchmark suite
Hostinger Cloud Professional (cloud hosting) page speed test from our benchmark suite
Hostinger cloud PageSpeed Insights scores, Professional plan (our test)
Hostinger cloud Pingdom load-time report, Professional plan (our test)
Hostinger Cloud Professional (cloud hosting) WordPress benchmark from our benchmark suite
Hostinger cloud TTFB by test region, Professional plan (our test)
Hostinger Cloud Professional (cloud hosting) uptime monitor results from our benchmark suite
Hostinger cloud uptime calendar by day, Professional plan (our test)

FAQ: Hostinger

Is Hostinger good for WordPress in 2026?

Hostinger is acceptable for low-traffic WordPress sites under 5,000 monthly visitors. At idle, 145ms TTFB is reasonable. But under 100 concurrent users, Hostinger times out entirely, making it unsuitable for sites with real traffic. For WooCommerce, Hostinger's 520ms checkout TTFB (vs 187ms on ScalaHosting) is a serious problem. Use Hostinger for budget blogs and personal sites. For business sites, WooCommerce stores, or any site expecting traffic spikes, ScalaHosting or Cloudways are better choices.

What is Hostinger's renewal price?

Hostinger's renewal prices are significantly higher than intro prices. Premium plan: $2.99/mo intro → $10.99/mo renewal (+268%). Unlimited plan (renamed from Business): $3.99/mo intro → $16.99/mo renewal (+326%). Cloud Startup: $9.99/mo intro → $25.99/mo renewal (+160%). Cloud Professional: $14.99/mo intro → $34.99/mo renewal (+133%). Always calculate the renewal price when comparing hosting costs, the 4-year total cost of Hostinger Unlimited is much higher than the intro price suggests.

Does Hostinger have CPU limits?

Yes. Hostinger's shared hosting uses a 'fair use policy' that translates to aggressive CPU steal limits under sustained load. My tests documented CPU steal rising from 5% at idle to 85% at 100 concurrent users, causing TTFB to spike from 145ms to 2,000ms+. This is documented in Hostinger's Terms of Service but not disclosed prominently at signup. Sites with sustained traffic (WooCommerce, membership sites, high-traffic blogs) will hit these limits.

How does Hostinger compare to ScalaHosting?

Hostinger wins on intro price ($2.99/mo vs $29.95/mo). ScalaHosting wins on everything else: 28ms vs 145ms TTFB, 33ms vs TIMEOUT at 100 users, 187ms vs 520ms WooCommerce checkout, 99.993% vs 99.91% uptime, no CPU steal vs aggressive throttling, daily backups vs weekly (Premium/Unlimited plans), staging environment vs none, 1.8hr vs 4.2hr support response. For budget blogs under 5k monthly visitors, Hostinger is fine. For any site with real traffic or WooCommerce, ScalaHosting is the better investment.

Is Hostinger good for WooCommerce?

No. Hostinger is a poor choice for WooCommerce stores with real traffic. Our test measured 520ms WooCommerce checkout TTFB on Hostinger vs 187ms on ScalaHosting, 4.7x slower. Checkout pages cannot be cached, so raw server speed matters. Under 100 concurrent users, Hostinger times out entirely. CPU steal throttling under sustained load makes checkout unreliable during traffic spikes. For WooCommerce, use ScalaHosting (187ms checkout, no CPU steal) or Cloudways (195ms checkout, Redis Object Cache Pro included).

What is Hostinger's uptime?

Hostinger achieved 99.91% uptime over 12 months of UptimeRobot Pro monitoring (1-minute check intervals). That's approximately 7.9 hours of downtime per year. This meets Hostinger's advertised 99.9% SLA. The longest single outage was 47 minutes. For comparison: ScalaHosting recorded 99.993% uptime (~37 min/year) and Cloudways recorded 99.981% (~101 min/year). Hostinger's uptime is acceptable for non-critical sites but below the best providers tested.

Does Hostinger include email hosting?

Yes, Hostinger includes email hosting on all shared plans. However, our deliverability test found only 72% inbox rate, meaning 28% of emails go to spam. This is caused by Hostinger's shared IP pools having poor sender reputation. For personal use, this may be acceptable. For business email (client communications, WooCommerce order notifications, newsletters), the 72% inbox rate is unacceptable. Use Zoho Mail ($1/mo per user) or Google Workspace ($6/mo per user) for reliable business email.


Final Verdict

Hostinger Final Scores

CategoryScoreNotes
CategoryScoreNotes
Speed (idle)7/10145ms TTFB, acceptable at idle
Speed (under load)1/10TIMEOUT at 100 users, site unavailable
Value (intro)9/10Cheapest hosting tested at $2.99/mo
Value (renewal)3/10268% renewal increase, $2.99 → $10.99/mo
Ease of Use8.5/10hPanel is clean and beginner-friendly
Support6/104.2hr avg response, not true 24/7 live chat
Uptime7/1099.91%, meets SLA but 7.9hrs downtime/year
WooCommerce2/10520ms checkout TTFB, not suitable
Email4/1072% inbox rate, poor for business use
Overall3.8/10Good for budget blogs, bad for real traffic

✅ Use Hostinger If: You need the cheapest possible hosting for a blog or personal site with under 5,000 monthly visitors, no WooCommerce, and no business email requirements. Hostinger's $2.99/mo intro price is genuinely the cheapest I've tested, and 145ms idle TTFB is acceptable for low-traffic sites.

❌ Use ScalaHosting Instead If: Your site has real traffic, runs WooCommerce, needs reliable business email, or requires a staging environment. ScalaHosting's 33ms at 100 users (vs Hostinger's timeout), 187ms WooCommerce checkout (vs 520ms), and 99.993% uptime (vs 99.91%) justify the 10x price difference for any site that generates revenue.

⚠️ Use ChemiCloud Instead If: You want budget hosting with better reliability than Hostinger at nearly the same price. ChemiCloud's $3.95/mo intro includes daily backups, no CPU steal, 91% email inbox rate, and a 45-day money-back guarantee, all things Hostinger lacks at the same price point.

Hostinger Shared Hosting, Full Review 2026 Logo
What Hostinger Does Well
  • Cheapest intro pricing tested: $2.99/mo (Premium plan)
  • 145ms idle TTFB, acceptable for low-traffic sites
  • hPanel is clean and beginner-friendly
  • LiteSpeed Web Server (faster than Apache)
  • Free SSL, free domain (1 year), free email hosting
  • 99.91% uptime, meets advertised 99.9% SLA
  • 100+ data centers globally
  • LiteSpeed Cache plugin (free, powerful)
Real Weaknesses (test Data)
  • TIMEOUT at 100 concurrent users, site becomes unavailable
  • CPU steal throttling under sustained load (documented)
  • Renewal price: $2.99/mo → $8.99/mo = 200% increase
  • No backups on Premium plan ($2.99/mo), must pay extra
  • Email deliverability: ~72% inbox rate (shared IP pool)
  • No staging environment on shared hosting
  • 520ms WooCommerce checkout TTFB (vs 187ms on ScalaHosting)
  • Support avg 4.2 hours response (not true 24/7 live chat)

Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-10)

  • Avg TTFB (Global, 10-location test): 205ms
  • Uptime (measured, 54-day window): 99.97%
  • PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 82/100
145ms TTFB (idle) | 520ms at 100 users | 99.95% Uptime | $2.99/mo intro → $8.99/mo renewal
Hostinger Homepage

CA$2.79/mo

Cheapest intro price, but read the renewal pricing

Visit Hostinger ➦

View Hostinger Plans ➦

For the full performance comparison across all providers, see our Best WordPress Hosting guide.