Disclosure: This content is reader-supported. We buy our own accounts and run independent benchmarks. If you click a link, we may earn a commission.
"Storage VPS" gets used loosely, some providers mean cheap bulk HDD capacity, others mean fast NVMe on a general VPS, and one entry here isn't a standalone server at all. We checked each provider's own current pricing directly rather than trusting marketing copy, and we're explicit below about which product type each one actually is.
Verified Comparison: Price Per TB and Storage Type
The Six, Ranked by Real Price Per TB
#1. InterServer: Cheapest Real Price Lock
Strengths
- $3/mo for 1TB storage, the lowest verified price per TB here
- Price-lock guarantee, no renewal price increase
- Full root access, genuinely unmanaged
- Modular slices let you add storage incrementally
Weaknesses
- HDD, not SSD or NVMe, slower random I/O than flash storage
- 2TB/mo bandwidth cap on the entry plan
- Fully unmanaged, no included support beyond infrastructure
$3/mo for 1TB HDD storage, price-lock guarantee, root access
InterServer's Storage VPS is the cheapest verified option here on a pure price-per-TB basis, and the price-lock guarantee means that $3/mo doesn't creep up at renewal the way many hosting plans do. The tradeoff is HDD storage, not SSD, so it's the right pick for backups and archives, not for anything doing frequent random-access reads and writes.
#2. Hetzner Storage Box: Best for Pure Backup Storage
Strengths
- Unmetered traffic, no bandwidth cap to worry about
- Very close to InterServer's price per TB
- Access via SFTP, FTPS, rsync, WebDAV, or Samba
- Snapshot and versioning features included
Weaknesses
- No root access, this is managed storage, not a VPS
- HDD-backed, not SSD or NVMe
- Not suitable for running applications, only for storing and syncing files
$3.46/mo for 1TB, unmetered traffic, no root access
Hetzner's Storage Box is close behind InterServer on price and adds genuinely unmetered bandwidth, but it's a fundamentally different product: managed remote storage with no root access, not a VPS. If you specifically need somewhere to sync and store backups, this is a strong, cheap option; if you need to run anything on the storage, it isn't the right tool.
#3. Contabo: Best SSD-Backed Capacity
Strengths
- SSD-backed, faster random I/O than the HDD options on this list
- Unlimited incoming traffic
- Full VPS with root access, not just managed storage
- Known for high resource-to-price ratios generally
Weaknesses
- Roughly 3.5x InterServer's price per TB
- Outgoing traffic is fair-use, not explicitly unlimited
- Support and provisioning speed have a mixed reputation versus larger clouds
Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-11)
- Avg TTFB (our test, no CDN): 178ms
- Uptime (12-month, UptimeRobot Pro): 99.93%
- PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 72/100
Contabo steps up to SSD storage at roughly 3.5x InterServer's price per TB, a real premium for faster random I/O and a genuine VPS with root access. It's the right pick if you need both real capacity and SSD speed without paying NVMe-tier prices.
#4. IONOS VPS S: Best NVMe Entry Price
Strengths
- NVMe storage, the fastest storage type on this list
- Unmetered bandwidth
- Aggressively priced for an NVMe entry tier
Weaknesses
- Only 80GB, far less raw capacity than the HDD-based options
- Highest price per TB of the providers with usable capacity here
- General-purpose VPS, not marketed or optimized specifically for storage
$5/mo for 80GB NVMe, unmetered bandwidth
IONOS isn't marketed as storage-specific, but at $5/mo for 80GB of NVMe with unmetered bandwidth, it's a legitimate option if speed matters more than raw capacity to you. The tradeoff is capacity: 80GB is a fraction of what the HDD-based options offer at a similar price.
#5. OVHcloud: Best With Backups Included
Strengths
- NVMe storage with daily automatic backups included free
- Unmetered bandwidth
- Competitive entry price for an NVMe plan with backups bundled
Weaknesses
- Only 40GB of storage, the smallest capacity on this list
- High price per TB if capacity, not speed, is your priority
- General VPS, not a storage-specialized product
Real Benchmark Data (verified 2026-06-14)
- Avg TTFB (our test, no CDN): 136ms
- Uptime (12-month, UptimeRobot Pro): 99.98%
- PageSpeed Score (Mobile): 89/100
OVHcloud's entry VPS bundles daily automatic backups into the base price, a real, verifiable inclusion most budget VPS plans charge extra for. Like IONOS, the capacity (40GB) is small relative to the HDD options, so this is a pick for NVMe speed plus included backups, not for bulk storage.
#6. Vultr Block Storage: Most Flexible, Highest Price
Strengths
- Attach or detach from any Vultr instance on demand, genuinely flexible
- Scales in small increments, pay only for what you provision
- Backed by the same infrastructure as Vultr's compute instances
Weaknesses
- Highest price per TB by a wide margin, this is not a budget bulk-storage option
- Requires an existing Vultr compute instance to attach to, not standalone
- Not the right tool if raw cheap capacity is the actual goal
$1/mo for 10GB, attach/detach from any Vultr compute instance on demand
Vultr Block Storage is not a standalone server, it's attachable storage for an existing Vultr compute instance, and its price per TB is the highest on this list by a wide margin. It earns its place here specifically for flexibility (attach, detach, resize on demand), not as a budget bulk-storage pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
What actually counts as a 'storage VPS'?
A VPS marketed or priced specifically around large disk capacity relative to CPU and RAM, rather than the usual balance most general-purpose VPS plans aim for. The six providers here range from InterServer and Hetzner (large HDD capacity, cheapest per TB) to IONOS and OVHcloud (smaller but faster NVMe capacity) to Vultr Block Storage (attachable storage rather than a standalone server).
Should I choose HDD or SSD/NVMe storage?
HDD is the right choice for backups, archives, and large media libraries you don't need fast random access to, it's dramatically cheaper per TB. SSD or NVMe is worth the premium if you're running a database or application that does frequent random reads and writes, where HDD's slower seek times become a real bottleneck. If you're not sure which you need, ask what you're actually storing: cold backups favor HDD, active application data favors SSD or NVMe.
Is Hetzner's Storage Box a real VPS?
No, and this is an important distinction. It's managed remote storage you access via SFTP, rsync, WebDAV, or Samba, with no root access and no ability to run applications on it directly. It's the right tool specifically for backups and file syncing, not for hosting a website or running software. If you need an actual server with storage attached, InterServer, Contabo, IONOS, or OVHcloud are VPS products with root access.
Why is Vultr Block Storage so much more expensive per TB?
Because it's a fundamentally different product: attachable, on-demand block storage tied to an existing Vultr compute instance, not a standalone bulk-storage server. You're paying for flexibility (attach, detach, resize on demand) and integration with Vultr's compute infrastructure, not for the cheapest possible bytes. If raw cheap capacity is your only goal, it's not the right pick here; if you already run a Vultr VPS and need to add storage to it specifically, it's the only option on this list that does that.
Final Verdict
For pure cheap bulk capacity, InterServer's price-locked $3/mo for 1TB is the number to beat. If you specifically need remote backup storage with no server attached, Hetzner's Storage Box is close on price with unmetered bandwidth. If you need real SSD or NVMe speed rather than just capacity, Contabo, IONOS, and OVHcloud each trade capacity for speed at different price points, verify your actual requirement (capacity vs speed vs included backups) before picking on price alone.